Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
85. I had a very different experience.
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 01:45 AM
Jul 2014

I was in a marginally red state, Nader never came up on anybody's radar I knew. I was a huge Nader admirer, and I appreciated what he brought to the table. I was extremely pissed off he was not allowed to be at the debates. I was completely disgusted by the Lieberman pick. Lieberman's debate performance was atrocious.

At the time I had access to cable (it was provided for free by the apartment I lived in). I was absolutely glued to CNN the whole time. Watched every debate. Punched my pillow whenever there would be some stupid ass crap about how Gore invented the internet, or how Gore was dressed, or how bland he was, or how he was very aggressive against Bush (getting all up in that poor down to earth guys' face, how dare he!).

So when I started to see that the polls were showing that it was very close I became extremely resentful over Nader's actions. Here I was in a red state (at the time, Colorado has since gone blue; and will stay that way for the indeterminate future), my vote meant basically nothing. I saw Nader campaigning in FL literally the day before the elections. I'm sitting there, wondering why the hell he would do that, when he had zero chance of winning.

Later I've come to realize that for Nader it wasn't about winning, it wasn't about supporting his party, it was about taking the Democrats down a notch. He even used the term "cold shower" to refer to why he was acting that way.

The big thing is though that he didn't really win over Democrats. He won over independents the most. The independent left, probably, we don't have the ideological exit poll data, or at least I can't find it. The exit poll up thread said independents were the deciding factor, not Democrats. I personally think the electoral map of FL would've looked a lot different if he didn't campaign so hard there.

So it's OK that you call me "another simplistic thinker." I obviously was a lot younger then and obviously couldn't influence anything. But to say that Nader didn't act aggressively against Gore's campaign I is think wrong. You didn't say that, you seem more focused on the fact that Liberman was a shitty pick. But Gore is alive so Lieberman would've never been President, and we would not have had half the shit hit the fan as it did (I do think the mortgage crisis would've happened though because the Democrats did pass legislation that attempted to get more renters into houses; a noble goal, if the loans weren't junk as by design by the elites).

One thing is for sure I have become much more active over that time, I singlehandedly got out 10% of the votes necessary to keep Colorado blue in 2010. I campaigned vigorously for marijuana legalization in 2012. And Colorado's GOTV and registering efforts have been an enormous success. Around election time you cannot go into any store without having a GOTV person trying to get you to register. While I have not been personally involved in registering people (I just took people to polls), I did help elect the guys that have got the ball rolling.

I think you will find going forward Colorado is going to be a shining example of our Democracy.

Lots of leftist groups in on the $cam. "Fundraising" is much easier under Republicans. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2014 #1
Yup. And Nader's Public Citizen is one of the winners under a Rethug administration. pnwmom Jul 2014 #8
+1. It's the same reason I don't take FDL seriously anymore. Tarheel_Dem Jul 2014 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #2
Did I paint such a narrative? joshcryer Jul 2014 #4
Tell that to the Nader supporters who thought he was a hero. n/t pnwmom Jul 2014 #10
Nader destroyed any respect intelligent, informed people might have for him BillZBubb Jul 2014 #3
We are in a bad way, BootinUp Jul 2014 #5
Looks like they'll be eroding the EEOC next. joshcryer Jul 2014 #6
Here's a major problem with your argument. Bonobo Jul 2014 #7
So, per your last paragraph you want Democrats geek tragedy Jul 2014 #9
This is not unusual from that DU'er. nt BootinUp Jul 2014 #13
Nope. Though usually more coy. nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #14
No, I want them to be taught the foolishness of ignoring their base. nt Bonobo Jul 2014 #16
the base of the party are minorities and women voters which are voting Dem JI7 Jul 2014 #40
Their base is African-Americans, Latinos, GLBT, Asians, younger voters, and geek tragedy Jul 2014 #80
It's about building the Green Party, not necessarily shifting Dems. joshcryer Jul 2014 #18
that's why he refused to support Paul Wellstone until very late JI7 Jul 2014 #11
Don't forget his sneering reference to "gonadal politics" geek tragedy Jul 2014 #12
People care about other issues besides just abortion betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #15
Sorry, but 308,000 Democrats voting for Bush vs 24000 for Nader is hard to overlook. progressoid Jul 2014 #17
A similar amount of Republicans voted for Gore. joshcryer Jul 2014 #19
Maybe you should straighten up and start expressing serious betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #20
I'm just trying to clear up the revisionism. joshcryer Jul 2014 #21
I don't deny Nader may have gotten votes from the left side of the democrats betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #22
I don't think he was obligated to help Gore. joshcryer Jul 2014 #29
I largely agree with you but disagree about 9/11. Jim Lane Jul 2014 #34
I think the gambit might have worked, though. joshcryer Jul 2014 #36
Trading speculations here.... Jim Lane Jul 2014 #66
You make good points. joshcryer Jul 2014 #69
Do we not have a dem potus betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #38
He had Congress for a whole 39 days. joshcryer Jul 2014 #42
He had both houses from 2008 to 2010 betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #44
Al Franken wasn't seated and Ted Kennedy died. joshcryer Jul 2014 #45
What Gore's Vp betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #46
No doubt Gore fucked that up. joshcryer Jul 2014 #48
Thank you for that? betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #49
Most Nader supporters were waffling independents. joshcryer Jul 2014 #51
Actually an activist career proves nothing betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #54
Gore's career after leaving office is untarnished. joshcryer Jul 2014 #57
He wasn't forced to accept the mandate at all betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #61
Yes he was, read Sanders' remarks on mandates. joshcryer Jul 2014 #64
Deficite Hawkery has never been compatable with progressivism betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #67
Gore failed on many fronts betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #56
It's apparant you're just googling anti-Gore stuff now. joshcryer Jul 2014 #60
Then your pretty damn cynical betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #63
Cynicism defines the political junkie. joshcryer Jul 2014 #65
How could the VP nom equal an issue exactly? BootinUp Jul 2014 #52
Well you know that VP Dick Cheney betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #55
Cheney did what Bush told/allowed him to do. Little thing called the Constitution BootinUp Jul 2014 #59
Not according to exit polls progressoid Jul 2014 #25
Similar enough. joshcryer Jul 2014 #26
8% and 13% are hardly similar. progressoid Jul 2014 #28
90% and 85% are. joshcryer Jul 2014 #30
True. I voted for Gore. Since you sort of asked. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #23
O'Connor should've recused herself. joshcryer Jul 2014 #24
And, since she realized.. "Sandra Day O’Connor Finally Realizes Bush v. Gore Ruling Was Terrible Cha Jul 2014 #31
I believe she has since said that her decision might have been wrong. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #33
Oh fuck yeah.. "TweedleDum and TweedleDee". When it's Nader who's TweedleDum and TweedleDee Cha Jul 2014 #27
yes, this is the shit that i hate, the fucking lies about no difference JI7 Jul 2014 #37
Lies.. exactly. And now naderites are using nader double speak to claim when we say "nader" we Cha Jul 2014 #39
K&R freshwest Jul 2014 #32
Kick Cha Jul 2014 #35
Nader "punished" the whole damn country. Especially the family and loved one of those Killed in Iraq Cha Jul 2014 #41
"cold shower" indeed... joshcryer Jul 2014 #43
the Law of Unintended consequences from Lying to get Votes.. and now the naders are out Cha Jul 2014 #47
I don't even care about that. joshcryer Jul 2014 #50
Oh yeah, some are grasping on to a thread of a pass for nader but it's double speak and doesn't Cha Jul 2014 #53
Why do you have such faith Gore would have kept us out of Iraq betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #58
Al Gore on September 23, 2002? joshcryer Jul 2014 #62
A position he took out of office betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #68
He appeared to be running in 2004. joshcryer Jul 2014 #70
And, Gore would have micromangaged the shit out of that August 6th memo. Cha Jul 2014 #72
+1 joshcryer Jul 2014 #75
Why do you even ask such a stupid question? Cha Jul 2014 #71
Because she doesn't want to talk about Nader? BootinUp Jul 2014 #73
Really. Distract with stupid inanity.. that's the ticket. Cha Jul 2014 #74
Sidenote: It wasn't Hiroshima and Nagasaki who broke Japan's will to fight. DetlefK Jul 2014 #76
The firebombing campaigns killed more. joshcryer Jul 2014 #77
it seems that this topic pops up from time to time, for whatever reason... Javaman Jul 2014 #78
Many DUers feel the urge to punish Democrats IronLionZion Jul 2014 #79
"Since Democratic Underground exists to bury the Democrats deep Underground." Jamaal510 Jul 2014 #84
During the 2000 election I was busy talking jaded showbiz liberals into voting for Gore over Nader Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #82
I had a very different experience. joshcryer Jul 2014 #85
Nader could have, no, SHOULD have supported Gore Zambero Jul 2014 #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"we want to punish t...»Reply #85