General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thanks, Nader. [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)What it comes down to is Harris, the SCOTUS, the "Brooks Brothers riot" and all the rest moved the result by around two thousand votes.
We wave a magic wand and poof Nader out of the picture, and Gore probably picks up most Nader voters. Let's say he does terrible with them and he only gets 10% of Nader's voters. That's 9000 votes.
A swing of 2000 votes doesn't matter if Gore won by 9500 instead of 500.
Nader was one piece of puzzle. Gore's lousy campaign was another. The media's anti-Gore bullshit was another. The Republican evil was another. Take away any one piece, and the election can't be stolen.
It's wrong to blame Nader for all of it. It's also wrong to say Nader had no part in it. And not that having a part in it does not mean he intended to cause this result.