Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thanks, Nader. [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)45. When people have a perfectly good opportunity to slam Republicans and instead they excuse them
and slam anyone else, I am suspect of that person's agenda. Protecting Republicans from blame is not my idea of a good use of time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Indeed! Nader has his share of the blame. Not all becuse Gore's campaign was horrible and the gop
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#1
Sorry but if Nader did not ru. Gore would not have needed to spend as much time in NM, WI, OR, and
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#9
Exit polls showed some would have voted. More said they would have voted for gore.
hrmjustin
Jul 2014
#27
Lets all huddle for warmth around the official 35 posters who spew it on demand!
bobduca
Jul 2014
#22
That's certainly not true. If Gore had decided not to run, some other Democrat would have.
Jim Lane
Jul 2014
#38
Would Gore have won if he turned further right to capture more "moderates"?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#44
When people have a perfectly good opportunity to slam Republicans and instead they excuse them
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2014
#45