Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,607 posts)
26. Oh, goodie.
Fri Jul 4, 2014, 12:22 AM
Jul 2014

Another "either you rush to judgment based on partial information spun in an inflammatory way or you knowingly side with a child-killer" poster.

The ultimate "if you're not with me, you're against all that's good and sane in life." I don't play well with that kind of manipulation and linguistic bullying. I recognize it for what it is. I also look at the psychology behind this kind of game and find it embarrassingly puerile.

Now, sometimes rushing to judgment results in a verdict that agrees with what jurors, looking at all the facts in context, decide. That's a bit of a head rush because, well, it means "we" are right. In some cases it's a downer, because obviously the jury failed to consider things properly and don't agree with us. In most cases it doesn't matter, we know we're right and stop following the media circus, barely noticing that we're obviously wrong.

All that remains is the sense of outrage that we weren't right in some instances--outrage that is fairly quickly forgotten--and the intensely memorable intense dopamine rush of being proven to be right. So we remember all the times we're awesome, downplay the times we suck, and ignore the vast number of times when ... What was that? Squirrel! In short, vigilantism is sometimes right and that's what we remember, so we get an inflated sense of our incredible awesomeness and wonderfulness.

I don't rush to judgment. And I'm usually too busy trying to understand what's going on to worry about immediate outrage, which has little to do with justice or thinking in general. Justice delayed it justice denied (a nice Anglophone saying), but justice rushed is justice buried (a nice Pakistani saying).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hot car distraction is what it is, another sentencing first, verdict later in the media circus court Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #1
Really? Michigander_Life Jul 2014 #7
Evidence deduced from the media is not evidence, and it is still not the media, or you, that gets Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #10
"Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"... MohRokTah Jul 2014 #20
most of the evidence came at his preliminary hearing today TorchTheWitch Jul 2014 #28
The standard of proof at a preliminary hearing is "could be guilty" and the evidence admission Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #29
I'll remember you said that when he's found guilty TorchTheWitch Jul 2014 #30
No problem.. When anyone is found guilty, no problem at all, that is my point. Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #31
The evidence is NOT being deduced from the media. MoonRiver Jul 2014 #32
Yes, a day ago it was, is that when the armchair verdicts were made, just yesterday? Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #33
I dunno, I must have missed the disdainful ones. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #2
I'm not going to do a call out Michigander_Life Jul 2014 #9
I suspect that some folks found it hard to believe Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #3
I guess they should slink away in shame for not rushing to judgment TwilightGardener Jul 2014 #4
Shameful how some people prefer evidence over speculation, the scoundrels. Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #14
Yeah, funny that...they pretend the court of public opinion will decide his fate in RL. Rex Jul 2014 #5
Links? JHB Jul 2014 #6
The original petition to the DA to drop the charges was withdrawn but Swede Atlanta Jul 2014 #8
Baby killer isn't debatable Michigander_Life Jul 2014 #12
He's a baby killer. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #21
Seriously, how dare anyone want to wait for more facts to be released before condemning? uppityperson Jul 2014 #11
It wasn't "wait for the facts" Michigander_Life Jul 2014 #13
I think you meant "condescension". n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #16
link? I've been off du so missed earlier coverage. uppityperson Jul 2014 #24
I dunno...the court of public opinion is still in session. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #15
Who cares? Should we demand apologies? arcane1 Jul 2014 #17
"What is to be gained from showing condescension to them now?" - Good question FSogol Jul 2014 #19
Benghazi! FSogol Jul 2014 #18
Don't you have a nipple to alert on? newcriminal Jul 2014 #22
people should not be tried in the press Skittles Jul 2014 #23
Should they feel bad for belittling posters for believing the evidence was convincing? Michigander_Life Jul 2014 #25
Oh, goodie. Igel Jul 2014 #26
oh for pete's sake. there were posters who said don't rush to judgment cali Jul 2014 #27
Since this is a tragedy that occurs yearly, perhaps etherealtruth Jul 2014 #34
I blame Ralph Nader. Orrex Jul 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happened to the post...»Reply #26