Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

quinnox

(20,600 posts)

5. No way. They actually did two other decisions recently that were great

Reply to edhopper (Original post)

Fri Jul 4, 2014, 11:01 AM

Jul 2014

and protected civil liberties and privacy. Of course, these rulings don't grab the lime light like the Hobby Lobby case did. I'm afraid that most people don't care about civil liberties or privacy in this society, sad but true.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Historically, is this SCOTUS [View all] edhopper Jul 2014 OP

I think they passed it a while ago awake Jul 2014 #1

Bush v Gore is the gold standard for corruption at the SCOTUS. Scuba Jul 2014 #2

They hit that level with Citizens United Armstead Jul 2014 #3

It Has, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2014 #4

No way. They actually did two other decisions recently that were great quinnox Jul 2014 #5

The Hughes Court was worse. rug Jul 2014 #6

I am not asking if this is edhopper Jul 2014 #7