Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
52. The "Arne Duncan part." Which would seem to be co-extensive with the "Barrack Obama part." Here:
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 01:17 AM
Jul 2014

>>>When the decision was issued Tuesday by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rolf M. Treu — who stayed his own decision pending appeal — school “reformers” who have long been trying to weaken teachers unions were thrilled. Duncan praised the decision, saying in a statement:

“For students in California and every other state, equal opportunities for learning must include the equal opportunity to be taught by a great teacher. The students who brought this lawsuit are, unfortunately, just nine out of millions of young people in America who are disadvantaged by laws, practices and systems that fail to identify and support our best teachers and match them with our neediest students. Today’s court decision is a mandate to fix these problems. Together, we must work to increase public confidence in public education. This decision presents an opportunity for a progressive state with a tradition of innovation to build a new framework for the teaching profession that protects students’ rights to equal educational opportunities while providing teachers the support, respect and rewarding careers they deserve.>>>>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/06/15/arne-duncan-issues-new-statement-with-the-right-lessons-from-vergara-trial/

The "why" is that the decision he praised ( Vergara) ended tenure in Cal. and thereby, in his view, made possible all the great things in paragraph 2.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bingo! HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #1
The Green Party accepts NO corporate donations. roody Jul 2014 #2
They're "reforming" education in the same way that Enron "reformed" energy sales. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #3
and Enron eventually became the company that couldn't explain what good or service it actually yurbud Jul 2014 #17
Brian Jones is a Marxist. Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #4
A great link below. And before you scare the horses... Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #22
Follow the Money. The DEMS are PAID to "misunderstand." blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #5
+1000 BrotherIvan Jul 2014 #6
What is this shit? You want President Romney? Scuba Jul 2014 #7
Hey.... oh I get it. LOL. rhett o rick Jul 2014 #10
Far too many here act like that. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #19
You obviously didn't get the memo. Its fuck Nader and the Greens week riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #8
I misread your post title as, "It's fuck Nader and the Greens weak". winter is coming Jul 2014 #44
Oh, they understand. Maedhros Jul 2014 #9
. rhett o rick Jul 2014 #11
Extraordinarily well-put. And yes, I agree. nt Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #41
The Democratic Party has broader appeal. joshcryer Jul 2014 #12
Which part of the Democratic Party thinks teacher tenure is a bad thing, and why? n/t winter is coming Jul 2014 #45
It's certainly not a party platform plank. joshcryer Jul 2014 #50
The "Arne Duncan part." Which would seem to be co-extensive with the "Barrack Obama part." Here: Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #52
Or "53% of CA Democrats." joshcryer Jul 2014 #55
The Green Party isn't paid not to understand. nt truebluegreen Jul 2014 #13
third-party voters vote for the party's program: the mainstream parties are voted for the party MisterP Jul 2014 #14
thanks to person who sent ALERT on this! yurbud Jul 2014 #15
What was the alert text? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #27
yep. yurbud Jul 2014 #33
How can I get a look at that? n/t Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #42
like this: yurbud Jul 2014 #49
Thanks. That's an odd alert given.... Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #59
They don't. You simply agree with them. jazzimov Jul 2014 #16
sometimes teachers aren't replaced because there aren't better ones waiting yurbud Jul 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #24
If they can't get into the system how do you know they're better teachers? winter is coming Jul 2014 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #54
unfortunately, those attacking tenure don't really give a rat's ass about quality yurbud Jul 2014 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #53
most of the time, it rests entirely on the principal until he determines someone is a bad egg yurbud Jul 2014 #66
Exactly. conservaphobe Jul 2014 #20
The answer may lie somewhere in the middle, but it is the MIDDLE-LEFT nikto Jul 2014 #25
Well said! LuvNewcastle Jul 2014 #56
How do we define poor performance? winter is coming Jul 2014 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #23
Why not remedial training? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #34
You're onto something HUGE here: Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #57
Well.... lots of districts have plenty of cash. Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #62
We've all had teachers we did not like betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #35
You observe them. roody Jul 2014 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #38
It's called a rubric in eduspeak. roody Jul 2014 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #40
GOP=Charybdis; Democratic Party=Scylla nikto Jul 2014 #21
Here's your answer to the thread question... nikto Jul 2014 #26
The only way the Democratic Party can survive... nikto Jul 2014 #29
The democratic party has simply abandoned all issues betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #31
F*CK NADER Puzzledtraveller Jul 2014 #32
Because, evidently.... ReRe Jul 2014 #36
Follow the money Marrah_G Jul 2014 #43
green party understand issues???LOL beachbum bob Jul 2014 #58
Thanks for your inciteful commentary on Education policy. JEB Jul 2014 #60
The really cynical answer is JoeyT Jul 2014 #63
Because with the exception of a few social issues... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #64
Dems promise use some crumbs and deliver fewer yurbud Jul 2014 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is it the *GREEN* Par...»Reply #52