Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton GOES TO BAT For GMOs At Biotech Conference [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)92. Embedded link I included states 90% of US soy is GMO but, of course, actual verification needed.
Otherwise, as you note, it's an assumption (or untested hypothesis) and I never claimed otherwise. Meanwhile, GMO labeling of baby formulas would provide that information, as CT is planning (below).
http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2014/04/superweeds-arent-only-trouble-gmo-soy
Tom Philpott| Wed Apr. 23, 2014
...According to the US Department of Agriculture, more than 90 percent of the soybeans churned out on US farms each year are genetically engineered to withstand herbicides, nearly all of them involving one called Roundup. Organic production, by contrast, is marginalit accounts for less than 1 percent of total American acreage devoted to soy. (The remaining 9 percent or so of soybeans are conventionally grown, but not genetically modified.)
Americans don't eat much of these lime-green legumes directly, but that doesn't mean we're not exposed to them. After harvest, the great bulk of soybeans are crushed and divided into two parts: meal, which mainly goes into feed for animals that become our meat, and fat, most of which ends up being used as cooking oil or in food products. According to the US Soy Board, soy accounts for 61 percent of American's vegetable oil consumption.
Given soy's centrality to our food and agriculture systems, the findings of a new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Food Chemistry are worth pondering. The authors found that Monsanto's ubiquitous Roundup Ready soybeans, engineered to withstand its own blockbuster herbicide, contain more herbicide residues than their non-GMO counterparts. The team also found that the GM beans are nutritionally inferior.
<>
Tom Philpott| Wed Apr. 23, 2014
...According to the US Department of Agriculture, more than 90 percent of the soybeans churned out on US farms each year are genetically engineered to withstand herbicides, nearly all of them involving one called Roundup. Organic production, by contrast, is marginalit accounts for less than 1 percent of total American acreage devoted to soy. (The remaining 9 percent or so of soybeans are conventionally grown, but not genetically modified.)
Americans don't eat much of these lime-green legumes directly, but that doesn't mean we're not exposed to them. After harvest, the great bulk of soybeans are crushed and divided into two parts: meal, which mainly goes into feed for animals that become our meat, and fat, most of which ends up being used as cooking oil or in food products. According to the US Soy Board, soy accounts for 61 percent of American's vegetable oil consumption.
Given soy's centrality to our food and agriculture systems, the findings of a new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Food Chemistry are worth pondering. The authors found that Monsanto's ubiquitous Roundup Ready soybeans, engineered to withstand its own blockbuster herbicide, contain more herbicide residues than their non-GMO counterparts. The team also found that the GM beans are nutritionally inferior.
<>
http://goo.gl/XGTSgZ
PDF: MARKET NEWS - GMO Foods and Labelling - SGS
...Additionally, on 4 June 2013, the State of Connecticut passed Bill HB 65279 that requires infant formula, or baby food, that is produced from GMOs to be labelled as produced with genetic engineering. This labelling is to start 1 July 2015 and the compliance enforcement date is 1 July 2019. This law becomes effective 1 October 2013, providing four additional states pass similar legislation, one of which must border Connecticut and the total population of those states exceeds 20 million people.(10)
PDF: MARKET NEWS - GMO Foods and Labelling - SGS
...Additionally, on 4 June 2013, the State of Connecticut passed Bill HB 65279 that requires infant formula, or baby food, that is produced from GMOs to be labelled as produced with genetic engineering. This labelling is to start 1 July 2015 and the compliance enforcement date is 1 July 2019. This law becomes effective 1 October 2013, providing four additional states pass similar legislation, one of which must border Connecticut and the total population of those states exceeds 20 million people.(10)
GMOs in baby formula discussed here:
http://www.gazettenet.com/home/11914998-95/bill-requiring-labeling-of-genetically-modified-foods-advances-in-massachusetts-house
Bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods advances in Massachusetts House
May 13, 2014
Bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods advances in Massachusetts House
May 13, 2014
http://naturallysavvy.com/eat/gmos-in-baby-food-what-you-need-to-know
GMOS IN BABY FOOD: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
By Eleanor Healy on March 25, 2014
GMOS IN BABY FOOD: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
By Eleanor Healy on March 25, 2014
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A lot of my DU friends strongly support HRC, but I cannot accept her past choices.
NYC_SKP
Jul 2014
#1
Well, she has evolved from being dead broke to millionaire by entertaining the corporations.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#39
H. Clinton has made it clear that she is the corporate choice for the Democratic nomination.
rhett o rick
Jul 2014
#3
You are lucky. But that kind of thinking will continue to see the lower classes decline.
rhett o rick
Jul 2014
#62
Put your faith in Monsanto, Sygenta and their ilk - they control the "science" you swallow
Crowquette
Jul 2014
#38
why would anyone give your opinion on this any weight when you don't even know the
cali
Jul 2014
#118
"Who gives a shit... that doesn't matter... you don't need people's opinion on a fact"
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#119
EXCITING NEW PRESS RELEASE - "Republication of the Séralini study: Science speaks for itself"
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#54
Dr Arpad Pusztai endorses GMWATCH.org so I follow & trust their vetting by virtue of his life story.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#67
No parallel, no MSM support anywhere. Imagine witnessing this whirlwind as a scientist or living it.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#74
WHO, AMA, The Royal Academy of Medicine, European Commission, etc. are not working Monsanto
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#95
Platitudes don't cut it though they sell stuff. Nuanced, but demonstrably and irrefutably wrong x5.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#97
No, Gung Ho GMOers are the left's Climate Change Deniers.. if you want to bring in Climate Change.
Cha
Jul 2014
#80
So? Science says GMO makes frankenfood and is full of Scientific Poison not Good for the Environment
Cha
Jul 2014
#83
the activists that claim all the resistance to such is because monsanto has something to hide.
redruddyred
Jul 2014
#117
If money matters, anyone can be a corporate shill and still tell you otherwise. Always watch
roguevalley
Jul 2014
#5
HRC: Blue Dog, Corporate ConservaDem, War Hawk, Triangulation/Bi-partisanship, DLC/Third Way, finger
blkmusclmachine
Jul 2014
#7
I see your corporate meme, and raise you one from human beings, not corporate citizens
Crowquette
Jul 2014
#30
NEW: Study suggests potential association between "soy formula" and seizures in children with autism
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#75
Embedded link I included states 90% of US soy is GMO but, of course, actual verification needed.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#92
"actual verification needed" if those who believed in such woo-hoo would actually live by that.
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#96
Oh, it's both. Where are the long term animal feeding studies demonstrating safety?
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2014
#45
They probably were done some or even many but when the test data dosn't come out like they wanted
nolabels
Jul 2014
#70
do you have any proof WHO, AAAS, AMA, National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society of Medicine....
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#102
so you avoid the question and instead give more conspiracy speculation and anecdotes.
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#113
Thanks for speaking truth. "drought resistance" is a standard lie of GMO propaganda pimps !!!
Crowquette
Jul 2014
#100
unfortunately, what with hmos and such, there have been a number of bad incentives in medicine
redruddyred
Jul 2014
#65
walked by a drug store this morning and looking in the front door the first thing you see is Pepsi
KurtNYC
Jul 2014
#32
No doubt, Hillary is so impressed with GMO foods, and their benefits, she backs lableling them.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#37
When I saw the article a few days back about Warren campaigning for Grimes, I wondered
winter is coming
Jul 2014
#78