Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
7. I remember reading something by Hendrik Hertzberg on "proportional representation" that makes sense.
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 06:11 PM
Jul 2014

I can't find the essay online, but here's the Wikipedia entry on PR.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_representation

Proportional representation (PR) is a principle applied to voting systems to elect an assembly or council to ensure that the number of seats won by a party or group of candidates is proportionate to the number of votes received. For example, under a PR voting system, if 30% of voters support a particular party then roughly 30% of seats will be won by that party.

PR is an alternative to voting systems based on single-member districts or on bloc voting. These non-PR systems tend to produce disproportionate outcomes for the winning party or parties (shares of seats larger than shares of votes) and are biased in favour of larger political parties. Under PR systems, smaller parties are allocated seats in proportion to their share of the vote and are thus more likely to secure a certain level of representation, although the details will vary from case to case depending on the details of any particular system.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Very interesting! emsimon33 Jul 2014 #1
Well it appears we are not running out of room that is for sure. yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #27
Just think if we could move away from geographic representation Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #2
I remember reading something by Hendrik Hertzberg on "proportional representation" that makes sense. cyberswede Jul 2014 #7
makes the electoral college seem moot handmade34 Jul 2014 #3
As a resident of Harris County, Tx if we did not have Tom Delay drawn district lines we could have Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #4
Very interesting when viewed that way. arcane1 Jul 2014 #5
Those are my favorite places lovemydog Jul 2014 #6
Santa Fe's not one of those blue counties! TygrBright Jul 2014 #19
Thank you. Rock on Bernalillo County! lovemydog Jul 2014 #21
We would be the most progressive country on earth if JaneyVee Jul 2014 #8
Case for reforming Congress into a parliamentary system, Exhibit A. NuclearDem Jul 2014 #9
K&R redqueen Jul 2014 #10
Madison WI should have two Senators undeterred Jul 2014 #11
More evidence that when Dems run a real progressive in Wisconsin, we win. When we run ... Scuba Jul 2014 #29
Thanks, explains a lot. Who knew? K & R mother earth Jul 2014 #12
Kicking. Thank you. nt littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #13
kick n/t RainDog Jul 2014 #14
Yes, I am one of the Overlords....... whistler162 Jul 2014 #15
Yep jeff47 Jul 2014 #17
The blue places decide economic, education, energy, lovemydog Jul 2014 #20
Now find a map showing ownership by agribusiness. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #16
GOOD to know! Thanks for posting this, jeff47! calimary Jul 2014 #18
The map's just population, not political affiliation. jeff47 Jul 2014 #24
just fascinating...lots to ponder. NRaleighLiberal Jul 2014 #22
a nationwide party-list Senate would actually be an interesting notion MisterP Jul 2014 #23
Pinellas County, Fl. secondvariety Jul 2014 #25
I agree get the red out Jul 2014 #26
I agree.... paleotn Jul 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One of the largest divide...»Reply #7