Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
104. I find your response to be dismissive at best and possibly insulting.
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 02:55 AM
Jul 2014

Please don't tell me that I can change all of my financial worries with a snap of my fingers, like it's that easy.

First, my introductory courses can't be taken elsewhere. To gain a degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering at the University of Washington, I need to have a certain number of my credits taken at the UW. That makes it challenging to get all those pesky intro calc and physics courses out of the way at another school. While it is possible that I could take those credits in-state at Oregon State University, the UW credit need still applies and at best I might be able to get a single year in state. Second, those intro courses that are taught at the UW are taught very differently at other schools. They are specifically designed to mesh with later courses in the Engineering Department. While it's great that you think that I can take them elsewhere, it's much more challenging to get in to the department as well as understand the material presented later on. I've seen the course material presented at OSU, and while the basics are the same, the emphasis is not. Add in a number of students in the department who have talked to me about their somewhat difficult experiences as transfer students, and you realize that it's not so easy to take basic (and theoretically the "same&quot courses elsewhere. Another possibility that might be raised is that I could attend a community college (and I wish I could) in order to save some money, but I'll tell you what: I tried that. The course levels offered (and at a pretty good sized community college) didn't come close to what I would have needed to apply to the aero department. While I'm happy for you that you managed to find a way to get around large tuition expenses, I don't have the same options.

Your next idea sounds nice: "Move to the other state, get a residence and a job. Live there for a year and establish residence so you can pay instate tuition." Sounds nice, that is, until you take a look at residency requirements (and please read them, they're important):

To establish domicile in the state of Washington, students must provide documentation showing they meet the following guidelines:

1) Students must prove conclusively that they have not come to Washington State primarily for educational purposes. Current guidelines require students who are enrolled for 7 credits or more a quarter must be employed at least 30 hours per week at a non-student job to overcome the presumption of educational purposes.

Okay, well that's easy enough. Right. There is no way I could work that much and still have time for classes, engineering projects, and you know, a life. But still, let's assume that I take a year off. We'll take a look through the rest of the requirements.

2) Live in the state for at least 12 consecutive months as legal residents. A legal resident is an individual who has relinquished all valid legal ties (e.g., driver's license, voter registration, etc.) with their former state of residence and established such ties in Washington in accordance with state and local legislation.

So re-obtain all of my legal ties with Washington instead of Oregon and live there for a year. I could do that, sure. That part is reasonable. I expect that.

3) Establish legal ties:
*Employment (if taking more than 6 credits a quarter during the first year of being present in Washington State).
*Driver's license/state ID. Students must obtain a Washington State Driver's License within 30 days of arrival if they have a current out-of-state driver's license. Students who do not possess a driver's license from any state, must obtain a Washington State Identification Card.
*Vehicle registration. Students who own or drive a vehicle in Washington must be registered in Washington within 30 days of arrival.
*Voter registration. Students who have a current out-of-state voter's registration must register to vote in Washington within 30 days of arrival. If an individual has previously registered to vote in another state, they must register to vote in Washington. If the student does not register to vote in Washington, this means that s/he may still vote absentee in the prior state of residency
*Establish a bank account in Washington.

Again, expected and noted. The next part is the fun part.

4) Be financially independent for the current and prior calendar years.

There is no way I could do that. It's not happening. This means I need to take a year off first of all, somehow find a job in Washington and an apartment I can afford on my own (hint: there aren't any), and then work there with no financial support from my parents. I guess that's possible. I could find a place, have my parents rent it until I could afford it, and then sever financial ties. However, now we've added on some time and I'm going to have to wait another extra year to start school because the undergraduate classes I need aren't offered every quarter. Then we get to the next year. I start school, and then I realize I can't receive help from my parents on my tuition. I hate to tell you, but there's no way I could afford to pay for college on my own even if I was working full time (which I couldn't) and receiving in-state tuition. Add on housing and food costs, and all of a sudden things aren't looking too good. Now my only options are to take out loans, saddling me with debt instead. Oh, and did I mention that tuition costs have increased for in-state students by 62% over the last five years? Yeah, that happened.


Now, I'm sure that you're someone who supports lowering the insane tuition costs that are still rising across the country right now, and I'm sure that you support students and education in general. I'm confident of that, actually, because normally I like reading your posts. But your response to me was demeaning and dismissive, as if I hadn't really thought about what I was doing. As if there aren't thousands of other students in the same boat as I am, getting screwed by the system we're stuck with. And it angers me. It's no longer an easy thing to attend any college, let alone an out of state one. I'm lucky enough that my parents were able to save some money and that I have a relative who's helping out, but some people don't even have that. Some of us don't have options. So please don't tell me we can fix everything just by thinking it through just a little bit more, and ignore the problem by pretending as if it's that easy for us to solve.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It depends on what American Dream means to people yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #1
That's Great - but the issue is the Oppurtunity is being taken away Tommymac Jul 2014 #46
At tip for future reference: read the article, the full article at the link before you answer. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #89
I meant 158K....Sorry yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #91
Makes sense. The article is pretty accurate about estimating the costs of life. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #94
Rec JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #2
Extremely modest estimate of expenses. antiquie Jul 2014 #3
Ditto in Central NJ JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #6
Remember that they were trying to estimate an national average value. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #63
is the median price of a home really $250,000? hfojvt Jul 2014 #44
Median home price here in my area is about $100K ... oldhippie Jul 2014 #50
so have I hfojvt Jul 2014 #62
I wish JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #68
I disagree about saving for college. F4lconF16 Jul 2014 #77
well there are other options hfojvt Jul 2014 #100
I find your response to be dismissive at best and possibly insulting. F4lconF16 Jul 2014 #104
If you're a slightly older adult SheilaT Jul 2014 #106
Not to appear rude PowerToThePeople Jul 2014 #108
The "American dream" is a pernicious falsehood. Spider Jerusalem Jul 2014 #4
I found their prices to be way too high. Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #5
some places the housing prices are easily $250K+ hobbit709 Jul 2014 #7
True, but as an average that seems high to me. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #10
As an average it is high. Find a realtor and have them run average prices on their MLS service. You ballyhoo Jul 2014 #54
$275 is reasonable JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #8
Ouch! NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #23
I agree, that is high! Frustratedlady Jul 2014 #58
My house was a cheap fixer upper too! JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #64
You're paying $10,200 a year in property taxes? ballyhoo Jul 2014 #56
Hunterdon County NJ JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #60
That's the highest I've ever heard ballyhoo Jul 2014 #61
That was Chris Christies whine JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #65
We'll I wish you luck. I wonder if there are ballyhoo Jul 2014 #66
We are okay JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #70
Number23? Okay. Thanks. ballyhoo Jul 2014 #71
Then you don't live in Los Angeles abelenkpe Jul 2014 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author ballyhoo Jul 2014 #14
Living in a cramped condo with your kids is not the American Dream. nt SunSeeker Jul 2014 #20
If 1200 square feet is cramped to you, ballyhoo Jul 2014 #25
Yes it is, especially if you have no yard. SunSeeker Jul 2014 #55
Your reference was to a 1200 square foot ballyhoo Jul 2014 #59
A 2BR unit for a family of four is considered cramped unless the children are very young Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #72
Depends how big the second bedroom is. But as they age it will be more ballyhoo Jul 2014 #86
Depends nothing. Housing two older,opposite gender children in the same room is substandard Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #88
Well, I understand your position. But based on what I'm seeing that ballyhoo Jul 2014 #92
As a girl growing up with a brother with whom I had to share a room, it sucked. SunSeeker Jul 2014 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author ballyhoo Jul 2014 #85
There are no houses for under $500K in L.A. that fit the American Dream ideal. SunSeeker Jul 2014 #95
Here. Long Beach is in LA County ballyhoo Jul 2014 #97
Long Beach is not Los Angeles. SunSeeker Jul 2014 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author ballyhoo Jul 2014 #99
PLease keep going HangOnKids Jul 2014 #103
Teen years are definitely the deal breaker. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #87
true. folks in my condo complex tend to move out as babies get older Liberal_in_LA Jul 2014 #101
welcome to DU3 Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #28
Condo in lake forest? abelenkpe Jul 2014 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author ballyhoo Jul 2014 #52
30% is the total of federal state and local taxes. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #12
That's not that conservative an estimate. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #22
do you include FICA in the 14%? hfojvt Jul 2014 #48
No, I hadn't. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #53
And it includes property taxes on that 275K house Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #69
NY, DC, LA, San Francisco ... either of the coasts etherealtruth Jul 2014 #15
Point two five percent? SheilaT Jul 2014 #17
Oh shoot , yes... I meant 25% etherealtruth Jul 2014 #19
Hi from Macomb County also! llmart Jul 2014 #30
Good to know there are more of us (Macomb Co) etherealtruth Jul 2014 #47
Mitt pays less than almost all middle class people. SunSeeker Jul 2014 #24
"Only the little people pay taxes." stillwaiting Jul 2014 #27
Want a good laugh? PasadenaTrudy Jul 2014 #32
That is insane. Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #36
It is insane PasadenaTrudy Jul 2014 #40
3100 sq. ft. isn't very small...but that price is astounding! cyberswede Jul 2014 #45
True.. PasadenaTrudy Jul 2014 #49
Other than the housing price being a little low, nails Denver TransitJohn Jul 2014 #67
Depends on where you hang out. DFW Jul 2014 #115
It would be nice if saving for retirement was affordable. tridim Jul 2014 #9
Tell me about it etherealtruth Jul 2014 #18
"It's a Big Club, and you ain't in it." - George Carlin Amonester Jul 2014 #13
Exactly what I was going to post. nt awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #73
It really does depend a lot on where you live and SheilaT Jul 2014 #16
It's amazing PasadenaTrudy Jul 2014 #37
Where you live can have a major effect on that. jeff47 Jul 2014 #76
I did not think I was confusing the two SheilaT Jul 2014 #80
My advice to any new parents at this point Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #78
That's a nice idea in practice, but kids in early SheilaT Jul 2014 #81
None of the aptitude tests I ever took came anywhere near to Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #84
Those tests aren't perfect, but I certainly found them very helpful. SheilaT Jul 2014 #107
I knew my family had been passed. Hugin Jul 2014 #21
and I bet they want it to be made by the man so the woman can stay home and Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #26
The article isn't like that. It just quotes where it got the figures and how its calculated riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #29
ok then. did not click on the link so then - they are saying it takes two people Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #31
Agreed. Which is why they're saying the "American dream" is dead for most people riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #33
No. A single person will have lower expenses. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #34
Agreed. I was simply dealing with figures in the article which is for a family of four riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #35
and I think that is why I went where I did with this ... the Model of the the Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #39
because you qualified with the word usaully, I will refrain from comment. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #38
You didn't state single parents. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #41
well, all I am driving at here ... is that it is a very narrow subset of Americans that fit Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #43
Agree. The "nuclear family" is an idealism. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #51
Honestly, I don't even think it is an idealism at this point. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #57
I know a lot of people who want it. NutmegYankee Jul 2014 #93
single earner families were the norm in the 50s and 60s. Starting in the 70s family income Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #74
yes. the end. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #75
I'm sorry but... ClarkeVII Jul 2014 #82
+1 ohnoyoudidnt Jul 2014 #90
Unfortunately, these sorts of studies always cause DU to desend into "4 yorkshiremen" mode... n2doc Jul 2014 #83
"Financial security" is dead for most Americans. Barack_America Jul 2014 #110
I'm not remotely interested in whatever version of the American Dream is being sold cali Jul 2014 #96
Just some added perspective.... defacto7 Jul 2014 #102
They left out the costs of vacations, hobbies, higher education, etc. Quantess Jul 2014 #105
Then that should be the minimum wage. maced666 Jul 2014 #109
The American Dream now days is having enough money to retire. B Calm Jul 2014 #111
Ain't that the truth n2doc Jul 2014 #112
This is way off....You can easily be living the "American Dream" in the Kansas City area for cbdo2007 Jul 2014 #113
Yes, but then you're living in Kansas City. Xithras Jul 2014 #114
LOL, The "American Dream" is not your personal dream... cbdo2007 Jul 2014 #116
From the second line of your own link: Xithras Jul 2014 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Price tag for the America...»Reply #104