Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
38. And I'm not saying there was discrimination, just that my experience would tilt it in that direction
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:01 AM
Jul 2014

Remember that the candidates resubmitted resumes so the LGBT activist was put in the "no" pile twice.

As I wrote above, the test was too limited and targeted companies where discrimination in hiring is apparently acceptable thus it's not surprising that there were fewer callbacks.

As someone in HR you are aware that extra effort must be made to ensure that you're not throwing too many resumes from protected class members in that "not interested" pile because of bias. With members of protected groups your company can't simply say it's because of grammar errors or under/over qualification if for example 80% of all the resumes for POCs end up in the "no" pile. You need procedures in place to mitigate potential bias. In this example, interviewing candidates perceived as slightly over or under qualified.

eta: having worked for Federal contractors, the HR also made concerted efforts to change recruiting strategies to identify more potential candidates who were POCs because traditional recruiting methods weren't delivering the diversity among candidates.

IMHO the point of this exercise was to pressure the Federal government to expand nondiscrimination categories to include LGBTers rather than an actual measure of the level of discrimination that is faced.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You can't be an LGBT and a feminist? rocktivity Jul 2014 #1
The "control" was similar political activism experience, whereas Cooperstown Jul 2014 #2
Problem is the work background is too strong. jeff47 Jul 2014 #20
It was better this way. It shows that someone being a liberal activist was fine with them -- pnwmom Jul 2014 #45
I scrub my resume of all political activism BainsBane Jul 2014 #3
Do you scrub the internet of all your political activism? Curmudgeoness Jul 2014 #11
I hope I don't apply there. A google search of my name brings up an obnoxious magician. Taitertots Jul 2014 #15
Oh, god, that would be a problem. Curmudgeoness Jul 2014 #23
no BainsBane Jul 2014 #19
It IS creepy. Curmudgeoness Jul 2014 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author jeff47 Jul 2014 #21
People put their full names on facebook? Or if they do, they don't lock those pages up tight? nt MADem Jul 2014 #24
Yes, people put their full names on FB. Curmudgeoness Jul 2014 #40
That's just ... cretinous and gross! The employer snooping, not the full name stuff. MADem Jul 2014 #43
Ah, memories. madamesilverspurs Jul 2014 #4
Didn't he know littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #8
Unless it's a pink triangle rickyhall Jul 2014 #13
.. littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #18
The "Assistant Office Manager" might be a bigger deferent than the activism. Renew Deal Jul 2014 #5
Exactly. They should have made resumes exactly the same. LisaL Jul 2014 #10
My thought exactly. nilram Jul 2014 #16
That's what stood out to me. tammywammy Jul 2014 #17
Exactly, it's not an apples to apples comparison IronLionZion Jul 2014 #25
Yep. Assistant Manager and Office Assistant are worlds apart. cbdo2007 Jul 2014 #39
Just practicing some of the corporate religion rurallib Jul 2014 #6
God, Inc. n/t RKP5637 Jul 2014 #27
What about any other applicants though? PlanetaryOrbit Jul 2014 #7
I have no doubt that employers discriminate on the basis of LGBT status. DeadLetterOffice Jul 2014 #9
K&R DeSwiss Jul 2014 #12
Excellent! ... and so many idiotic ignorant youtube comments. n/t RKP5637 Jul 2014 #28
I'm thinking resumes are electronically scanned and categorized..... radhika Jul 2014 #14
Not a manager, an assistant office manager. Assistant. Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #29
Which is why, questionable methodology or not, my response to the OP is "no shit." nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #41
This proves nothing. being an asst office mgr and applying for admin asst might be a downgrade magical thyme Jul 2014 #26
Of course the fact that it is fully legal to discriminate against LGBT people in 29 States offers a Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #31
the fact that 7 gov contractors have such policies is the proof. magical thyme Jul 2014 #34
Sorry. This doesn't prove much. Dawgs Jul 2014 #30
Want proof? Look at the 29 States that allow legal discrimination against LGBT people. Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #32
Relax. I'm not saying that states don't allow discrimination against LGBT people. Dawgs Jul 2014 #33
As some one who has worked in Fair Housing enforcement research, here's what I see. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #35
I think where you and I disagree is on the ignore part. Dawgs Jul 2014 #36
And I'm not saying there was discrimination, just that my experience would tilt it in that direction Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #38
+1 nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #42
The issues this experiment was out to prove is real. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #37
Don't need no stinkin' fake resumes to know this is true. Behind the Aegis Jul 2014 #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fake Job Applications Pro...»Reply #38