Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2012 #1
Thanks. mmonk Apr 2012 #31
K&R libtodeath Mar 2012 #2
Thanks. I signed the petition lunatica Mar 2012 #3
kic'd/rec'd/faced/tweeted & emailed!. . . . . . n/t annabanana Mar 2012 #4
OWNC RobertEarl Mar 2012 #5
Excellent. mmonk Mar 2012 #6
Awesome. Ed Suspicious Mar 2012 #7
Yes, Steve Forbes should be allowed to vote and give to campaigns. jerseyjack Mar 2012 #19
What is ALEC and why can't you just type it out? xtraxritical Mar 2012 #8
American Legislative Exchange Council supernova Mar 2012 #11
The Richie Rich motherfucking bloodsucking skankwad nutfuckers of the 1% who throw all the dough lonestarnot Mar 2012 #13
You left out Koch-licking and santorum-spewing.....let's get it right here. lastlib Mar 2012 #15
I thought that was understood by fucking all. I get nothing RIGHT! But for smelling the CON lonestarnot Mar 2012 #17
Sorry. Had to leave after the post. mmonk Mar 2012 #22
You're so cute.....! happerbolic Mar 2012 #28
I am? mmonk Apr 2012 #30
+1. On related subject, today is the last day we can contribute to Elizabeth Warren. Zorra Mar 2012 #9
Excellent reminders. mmonk Mar 2012 #21
Signed supernova Mar 2012 #10
K&R&signed!! SunSeeker Mar 2012 #12
This is great. An enthusiastic K&R! nt riderinthestorm Mar 2012 #14
did it gopiscrap Mar 2012 #16
Done felix_numinous Mar 2012 #18
Remember, states can call a Constitutional Convention anmd change this. They don't need Congress. jerseyjack Mar 2012 #20
The phrasing is contradictory, and fails to address the core issue of Citizens United eallen Mar 2012 #23
1 & 2 establishes the limitation to natural persons. mmonk Mar 2012 #25
So, does that give NYT (not a natural person) protection in publishing political editorials? eallen Mar 2012 #26
The issue with Citizens United is corporate personhood and money as speech. mmonk Apr 2012 #29
You didn't answer the questions: Would the NYT, a corporation, still have 1st amendment protection? eallen Apr 2012 #32
I did. The issue in question was do Corporations have Bill of Rights protections mmonk Apr 2012 #33
Was that a "yes"? Or a "no"? eallen Apr 2012 #34
This long overdue but I fear.............. Swede Atlanta Mar 2012 #24
Signed! onestepforward Mar 2012 #27
Did you see MSNBC this a.m. lonestarnot Apr 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eventually, you will have...»Reply #35