Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I just watched a discussion on C-Span about Mars [View all]WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)76. Look, PAL, this ain't about religion, and I never implied such. Tell me: Who do you
suppose will be able to escape the befouled planet Earth? You? Your offspring? You think travel to Mars will be like a commuter train?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
you want "mankind to survive" that means fixing earth not wasting money going to mars nt
msongs
Jul 2014
#1
It isn't clear to me at all that sending humans to mars is "good science".
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#10
yes sure there could be incidental benefits. As there are right now with nasa's unmanned exploration
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#34
I'm one of those who believes that - in ALL the universe, so big, so vast, so greatly UN-explored
calimary
Jul 2014
#49
You think regular Joes would be allowed to leave here? Bwahaha! Yeah, spaceships like subway trains.
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#44
Think of how tragic it would be to foul our nest and then go foul the nests of others
arcane1
Jul 2014
#52
How do you think an airless, waterless place without soil, getting far less solar radiation
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2014
#55
the fall back is "well sure its a waste of money but 'freeze dried food'". nt.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#67
I have a problem with "we should spend a shit ton of money 'cause in a thousand years..."
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#87
"The reason non-avian dinosaurs are extinct is because they didn't have a space program."
longship
Jul 2014
#17
If the survival of mankind is the goal, Mars isnt the best place to attempt that goal.
hatrack
Jul 2014
#5
The only thing that would make Mars preferable to Earth for the rich would be a revolution
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2014
#57
Why waist money going to mars. Why waist it going to the moon. When you think about it........
wandy
Jul 2014
#7
Why some strive for progress and the preservation of human kind while others.......
wandy
Jul 2014
#23
We can send 50 really smart well equipped robots to mars for the price of one human.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#9
No kidding, I'm still waiting for all the promises the ISS was supposed to bring us. n/t
arcane1
Jul 2014
#54
and you think that it is impossible for robotics to provide equal or superior range of vision
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#72
So surgeons are performing remote presence surgery, but geology is "just too complicated".
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#74
I would not presume to make declarative statements about the practice of surgery,
Maedhros
Jul 2014
#75
right, cause this is a serious academic forum rather than an anonymous internets bullshit session.
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#88
I just don't understand why you feel so compelled to disregard my expertise on this matter.
Maedhros
Jul 2014
#91
There needs to be a balance of working to save our only home in the Universe and
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
#13
Look, PAL, this ain't about religion, and I never implied such. Tell me: Who do you
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#76
I can non-sequitur with the worst of'em. Same as Saddam's having WMD's, right?
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#78