General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Seen on Facebook; An extraordinarily well written response to an anti-choice post [View all]avebury
(11,197 posts)herself pregnant should be forced to carry a child to term that she did not voluntary participate in the conception of? So once she has already been violated, should be violated again by removing from all rights to make decisions about her own body?
Do you also believe that a woman with pre-existing medical conditions be forced to carry a child even after being told by medical professionals that there is a high probability that she will not survive the pregnancy? We all hear about heroic woman who sacrifice themselves to try to carry a child to term but that is always their choice. Years ago when I worked in a hospital I know of a woman who had been told in no uncertain terms that she should not get pregnant again. She did, attempted to carry the child to term - neither survived.