General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Seen on Facebook; An extraordinarily well written response to an anti-choice post [View all]justanaverageguy
(186 posts)of course it's not manslaughter.
Roe vs Wade is a legal standard not a moral standard....but let's look at Roe v Wade says. I'm paraphrasing here but basically what Roe V Wade says is that after it becomes viable for the fetus to live out of the womb it is then a legitimate government interest to protect the fetus. (that's why late term abortions can be against the law) Of course in 1973 that was a point much further along in the pregnancy than it is today. How do you apply Roe v Wade when medical science learns to save a fetus that is just weeks old? In 1973 it would have been unheard of for a fetus of less than 22 weeks to survive....but no more. The current record is 21 weeks, and 6 days.
If life doesn't begin at conception when does it begin? When does the fetus become a life worth protecting? Should a person who kills a pregnant woman be charged with 2 murders?