General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Seen on Facebook; An extraordinarily well written response to an anti-choice post [View all]justanaverageguy
(186 posts)No did I make any assumptions or implications about when women have abortions. I in fact have no idea when women commonly have abortions. Your answer to my question was to reference Roe v Wade. By the way it's not "and/or" it's simply "or". According to Roe v Wade it is when a baby is born or is viable outside the womb.
My question to you was, since you are seemingly comfortable with the Roe v Wade standard, are you going to be fine when medical science advances to the point that a 15 week or even 10 week fetus becomes viable, then as a result abortion after that time become illegal? I ask this because the reasoning of Roe v Wade would be ok with it.
The legal definition of person-hood under Roe v Wade reasoning will forever be a shifting point as medical science progress. I prefer to think that the beginning of life is more objective than that.