Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

econoclast

(543 posts)
13. Not a suggestion
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 05:16 PM
Jul 2014

As I am not in the 'catastrophic overpopulation' camp I in fact hope you don't!!!!

But a genuine question. How do you hold the position and decline to act?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The solution to most economic and social problems is a 32 hour work week. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #1
Some people need to work 60+ hours just to make ends meet davidn3600 Jul 2014 #2
I'm more concerned with the person working zero hours. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #4
So everybody's standard of living can go down? Travis_0004 Jul 2014 #45
Yup. Just like standard of living went down when FDR signed the 40 hour week. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #51
They can if they get a living wage for those 32 hours, LWolf Jul 2014 #5
The other solution is higher wages bhikkhu Jul 2014 #6
Higher wages is a consequence of a constrained labor supply lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #16
And a constrained labor supply comes from a declining birth rate. bhikkhu Jul 2014 #27
The US doesn't have a declining population. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #49
If you break down the demographics on that... bhikkhu Jul 2014 #67
"The baby boomers" lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #69
You probably won't like this site either bhikkhu Jul 2014 #74
Good for many industries, but can be problematic for those positions that require hughee99 Jul 2014 #14
I don't care that finding additional workers "is problematic". lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #18
When labor shortages in the medical industry occur, hughee99 Jul 2014 #22
When labor shortages in ANY industry occur, the industry brings in more workers. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #48
"Arbitrarily large amounts of education"? hughee99 Jul 2014 #54
How about 20% more med schools? lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #58
Because Cuba spent YEARS building the infrastructure to do this. hughee99 Jul 2014 #60
It would happen overnight if consumer groups were in charge of school accreditation. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #61
If "consumer groups" (widely renown for their expertise in medical education) gave accreditation hughee99 Jul 2014 #62
Can you give me an example of another occupation... lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #71
How about the legal profession? hughee99 Jul 2014 #73
It is already 35-hour work week yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #29
How does a professor work a 35 hour week? caraher Jul 2014 #56
easier on families - allows women with children to stay in the workforce Iris Jul 2014 #50
When Ehrlich was researching his ideas, the effects of the petrochemicals SoCalDem Jul 2014 #3
The sky is falling either way you look at it bhikkhu Jul 2014 #7
+1 nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #25
the planet would be far better off if there were zero human babies geek tragedy Jul 2014 #8
I am always fascinated econoclast Jul 2014 #11
I am always bored by sophistry. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #12
Not a suggestion econoclast Jul 2014 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Jul 2014 #17
That is bull betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #19
they also have overwhelming population density geek tragedy Jul 2014 #20
Quite frankly .... You frighten me econoclast Jul 2014 #21
16.5 trillion people on planet earth does not frighten you? geek tragedy Jul 2014 #23
China abandoned its one child policy malaise Jul 2014 #38
Someone bored by sophistry just extrapolated exponential growth 2000 years into the future. mathematic Jul 2014 #39
well, then, we agree that SOMETHING has to rein in the rate of human population growth geek tragedy Jul 2014 #46
"China's "one child policy" will have to be expanded to the entire planet, and ruthlessly enforced" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2014 #59
maybe a bit of overdramatization. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #63
There are many ways to act, and I think at this point individual decision is best bhikkhu Jul 2014 #28
Oh goodness yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #30
Science. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #32
You don't think we could sustain a 10 billion person World? yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #34
10 billion? I'm talking 90 billion in 1000 years, 16.5 trillion geek tragedy Jul 2014 #35
It's folly to extrapolate the numbers out that far customerserviceguy Jul 2014 #37
the point I'm making is that something has to change that number. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #47
Agreed customerserviceguy Jul 2014 #64
It's already changing; I don't know where you got 1.2%, but that's out of date muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #65
Ya. I guess I was seeing the revanchism from the geek tragedy Jul 2014 #68
I admit you are right yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #43
If you are really against pollution, why don't you stop driving a car and heating your home? Squinch Jul 2014 #44
Ah. The moral equivalence of contraception and suicide. Orsino Jul 2014 #72
DU: located at the intersection of nihilism and misanthropy n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #52
and science, and math. nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #53
When the global population falls to, let's say, LWolf Jul 2014 #9
I think the population drop will be disruptive for a while, but will benefit us in the long term. Brigid Jul 2014 #10
Why nothing will happen to change this. betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #15
The inherent problem: any system predicated on limitless growth ultimately fails. Spider Jerusalem Jul 2014 #24
Tough shit, people of the world. We're past the carrying capacity as it is, need to slow it down. NYC_SKP Jul 2014 #26
Or...they could lead to unprecedented increases in prosperity and technology. Xithras Jul 2014 #31
Please stop spamming your blog. LeftyMom Jul 2014 #33
+1 n/t X_Digger Jul 2014 #57
dont tell China or India angrychair Jul 2014 #36
Not this shit again. nt bemildred Jul 2014 #40
Oh for pete's sake. The Earth now has 7 BILLION people, and climbing. Hekate Jul 2014 #41
Oh, don't worry. Just outlaw female contraceptives. Hekate Jul 2014 #42
I've read that earlier generations had a "village" fried eggs Jul 2014 #55
Sad to see a Harvard professor throwing fearmongering 'time bombs' muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #66
bringing our population down gradually to <3B over the long term would be a good thing. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study: Falling fertility ...»Reply #13