General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Seen on Facebook; An extraordinarily well written response to an anti-choice post [View all]laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)17, 13, 11, and 7. They are the lights of my life. I feel incredibly lucky to have them and I treasure every second with them.
That's interesting they figured because you were fat, high BP was ok. I'm fat, and that made them PANIC at my high systolic level. With my first, my doctor was so anti-fat that he was SO certain there would be issues with gestational diabetes, a giant baby, shoulder dystocia etc that he caused some of the very problems he was trying to avoid (baby ended up being 6.5 lbs.
) I really educated myself with my second and always made sure after that I had doctors that listened to me and let me make my choices. My second doctor told me I should've sued my first, lol, and told me my high top number on my BP was probably normal for me during pregnancy. As soon as I'm not pregnant, my BP is perfectly normal (110/68). I think doctors always carry their last 'bad experience' in their mind and have too many biases based on that, and 'manage' pregnancies based on it. I'm glad they caught your eclampsia in time - it IS rare to have it appear so long after birth (what I've read is 24-48 hours or so after birth it's a risk, not 5 days). I've heard a good number of stories of women dying from things like blood clots in the lungs or systemic infection a few days after a birth...so even if you are ok right after the birth, everything is not always 'in the clear'. I think even some doctors need to be reminded of that stuff. I found the nurses a lot more concerned with those things when I was in the hospital after my C-sections than the doctors were.