Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Woman’s Attempt To Troll Liberals Backfires When Someone Notices This Disturbing Similarity [View all]Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,477 posts)70. Have any of you read Eric Hoffer's
The True Believer? It was written in 1951 by a self-educated dockworker in San Francisco, about the psychological causes of fanaticism. The main premise is that mass movements promise a wonderful future, and their followers should be willing to sacrifice everything for that future. These movements toss aside the past and the present as either bad or irrelevant. ("Comes the revolution..."
.
Hoffer argued that mass movements appeal to the frustrated; people who are unhappy with things as they are, by promising a glorious future. ("There'll be pie in the sky by and by"
Also, the people who join a mass movement feel no longer alone and insecure.
Hoffer also argued that movements are interchangeable and that members of a movement which fails or with which they grow disillusioned can easily move from one movement to another.
The book is still in print and available in paperback. It's well worth reading.
I would also note that Hoffer was the single genuine American proletarian philosopher of the 20th century, and he was staunchly opposed to Marxism.
Hoffer argued that mass movements appeal to the frustrated; people who are unhappy with things as they are, by promising a glorious future. ("There'll be pie in the sky by and by"
Hoffer also argued that movements are interchangeable and that members of a movement which fails or with which they grow disillusioned can easily move from one movement to another.
The book is still in print and available in paperback. It's well worth reading.
I would also note that Hoffer was the single genuine American proletarian philosopher of the 20th century, and he was staunchly opposed to Marxism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Woman’s Attempt To Troll Liberals Backfires When Someone Notices This Disturbing Similarity [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2014
OP
Here you go. Google image search results 'sarah palin flag cross' click image, then view image, C&P.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#48
Feelings, not facts, is their method. Regulations are for 'statist' stuck ups.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#115
Saw it a lot in the computer industry - Apple even called their own people "evangelists". nt
bananas
Jul 2014
#106
Just because one is proletarian does not mean one must support Marxism.
Fortinbras Armstrong
Jul 2014
#84
I responded to you in that thread, but here is my response in this thread:
Fantastic Anarchist
Jul 2014
#124
As I pointed out to mopinko, staunch and devout aren't the *exact* same thing, TBH.
AverageJoe90
Jul 2014
#103
You've just committed the fallacy of affirming the consequent. Congratulations.
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2014
#110
While in the military I was on flag raising duty .. I once surrendered the base LOL !!
YOHABLO
Jul 2014
#113
Saw this posted somwhere earlier and checked out her twitter account. She is hard core RW
Fla Dem
Jul 2014
#5
Here's an earlier thread on this, but with less background info, so I'll K&R yours too :)
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#6
Not only the same smile, but posted at the same time, same day, same # retweets, & same #favorites
aikoaiko
Jul 2014
#7
Probably just a quick lazy copy-paste by the person who was juxtaposing the images
Electric Monk
Jul 2014
#12
Doubling down. She is now a conservative heroine with media appearances, etc.
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#80
"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party,
IronLionZion
Jul 2014
#46
This mocking of her and comparison to a Muslim woman indicates intolerance and xenophobia.
NYC_SKP
Jul 2014
#59
Yes, valid in the context of their experience. This is true for every human everywhere.
NYC_SKP
Jul 2014
#119
Ha ha #GOPfail. I pray she gets a rise out of liberals - to rise up and go vote! n/t
Beartracks
Jul 2014
#65
She is a pathetic person who craves the approval of horrible, abusive people.
King_Klonopin
Jul 2014
#69
a thousand kicks - extreme fundamentalism is all the same regardless of the religion
samsingh
Jul 2014
#93
Monotheism is dangerous! We didn't have this crap when we worshipped trees.
McCamy Taylor
Jul 2014
#116
The big difference is that AFAIK the woman on the left does not want to murder people,
Nye Bevan
Jul 2014
#128
Is "inciting" a deranged gun nut to go out all in and commit a TEArorist act...
Amonester
Jul 2014
#129