Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
20. Part II......Why can't....
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 08:40 AM
Jul 2014

an individual sue now on private insurance plan? The mandate requires insurance companies to cover birth control. The intent of it was to prevent insurance companies from discriminating against women...not covering bc while covering other medications.

If employers can object to paying for this coverage, now individuals should be able to object to paying for it too on religious grounds. Will they expect a lower premium? Seems this is unavoidable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R x 10000 Armstead Jul 2014 #1
Perfect. n/t DirkGently Jul 2014 #2
K & R LiberalLovinLug Jul 2014 #3
K&R.... daleanime Jul 2014 #4
corporations as people seems to be the scotus's way to insult the American public samsingh Jul 2014 #5
K&R. Paladin Jul 2014 #6
K and R!!!! LuckyLib Jul 2014 #7
Tom Rocks colsohlibgal Jul 2014 #8
Perfect n/t Oilwellian Jul 2014 #9
K&R! myrna minx Jul 2014 #10
Cartoon contains words Hobby Lobby... Phentex Jul 2014 #11
Thanks Hissyspit! NealK Jul 2014 #12
Just reposted to facebook. I feel bad that my devout Catholic dad might be offended, Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2014 #13
Tom Tomorrow nails it again. n/t Comrade Grumpy Jul 2014 #14
Kick! scarletwoman Jul 2014 #15
Kicked and recommended! Great toon! Enthusiast Jul 2014 #16
K & R L0oniX Jul 2014 #17
The shame is, none of the cretins will recognize themselves amuse bouche Jul 2014 #18
K & R Quantess Jul 2014 #19
Part II......Why can't.... cynzke Jul 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TOM TOMORROW: Corporation...»Reply #20