Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

it means giving up the only power we have samsingh Jul 2014 #1
S'truth. And Red states are trying to take it away, bit by bit. riqster Jul 2014 #3
They first start trying to suppress votes as soon as a state turns purple. LLD Jul 2014 #74
They are trying to suppress blue votes. They're getting out the red vote. merrily Jul 2014 #93
Very true indeed. Which means we must bring out the blue vote. riqster Jul 2014 #95
I know it's true. I watched the IRS hearings on C-Span. merrily Jul 2014 #97
Watching it happen in Ohio. Turning a purple state red. riqster Jul 2014 #100
In great part, 2000 and 2004 used the gay marriage issue on merrily Jul 2014 #101
What I meant was that it is a continuous process that happens during and between elections. riqster Jul 2014 #105
Yes, and without sufficient resistance. merrily Jul 2014 #106
Oh, hellz yeah. The Ohio Dem party is worse than useless. riqster Jul 2014 #107
I didn't mean Ohio specifically. It's a pattern. merrily Jul 2014 #109
Apologies. It's my home state, and where most of my AFK activism is concentrated. riqster Jul 2014 #113
Not monomania and no apologies necessary. Au contraire. merrily Jul 2014 #114
It's rather baffling that you think this is "the only power you have" Scootaloo Jul 2014 #22
Those are indeed powerful tools. But the vote is far more potent. riqster Jul 2014 #23
And how do those tools actually cause an effect in our system? jeff47 Jul 2014 #48
In politics, though, money talks. merrily Jul 2014 #94
Money is used to get people to the polls. riqster Jul 2014 #98
It's used for far more than that. And the money that is used to merrily Jul 2014 #99
Recommended. H2O Man Jul 2014 #2
+1 riqster Jul 2014 #4
Emma Goldman 2016 n/t leftstreet Jul 2014 #5
To stop me from going to the Voting Box.. Lady Freedom Returns Jul 2014 #6
And that is also the only way TO stop me from voting. riqster Jul 2014 #18
It's also not activism. MineralMan Jul 2014 #7
Indeed. It's "passivism". riqster Jul 2014 #17
If voting doesn't matter, why is the GOP working so hard to stop people from voting? greatlaurel Jul 2014 #8
Just so. Republicans want to limit the exercise of the right to vote. riqster Jul 2014 #19
GOTV 2014 sheshe2 Jul 2014 #9
^^^THIS^^^ riqster Jul 2014 #20
I was baffled when Russel Brand tried to declare that refusing to vote IS rebellion. DetlefK Jul 2014 #10
And refusing to vote until our dream comes true, ensures continuing nightmares... freshwest Jul 2014 #12
Perfectly put: riqster Jul 2014 #16
+1 sheshe2 Jul 2014 #21
Why would anyone would take political advice from a guy who looks wasted most of the time? n/t winter is coming Jul 2014 #26
Same could be said of Boehner... riqster Jul 2014 #47
Yes, and he's just as entertaining, albeit not intentionally. n/t winter is coming Jul 2014 #87
First of all Russel Brand is not even an American yeoman6987 Jul 2014 #28
Voting is indeed different over there. riqster Jul 2014 #32
"everything we've ever dreamed of" LMFAO ...like Obama? L0oniX Jul 2014 #49
I never thought he'd be even close. riqster Jul 2014 #56
, blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #11
I had a roommate in college and later, a boss who both had never Jenoch Jul 2014 #13
Depending on the flavor of their apolitics, it is debatable. riqster Jul 2014 #24
What is debatable? Jenoch Jul 2014 #88
Whether we should assume that it's better for apolitical people to not vote. riqster Jul 2014 #91
Ok, then WHY is it debatable? Jenoch Jul 2014 #120
I read your post. I think we need to educate and engage. riqster Jul 2014 #121
Oh don't be mistaken. Jenoch Jul 2014 #122
Yep. Rule Twelve: "There are some people you just can't help." riqster Jul 2014 #123
K & R. GOTV, DU FSogol Jul 2014 #14
Article on apolitical Americans: riqster Jul 2014 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #25
That's what primaries are for. To get the candidates we want. riqster Jul 2014 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #34
Me too. General or primary. riqster Jul 2014 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #82
So many died, and were beaten to a pulp Peacetrain Jul 2014 #27
I hear ya. riqster Jul 2014 #30
I offer ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #59
I daresay you're right. riqster Jul 2014 #61
So very, very true. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #67
I live in Maryland. Whether I vote will not make a difference. Vattel Jul 2014 #31
Bull-fucking-shit. Sorry, but that is absolute rot. riqster Jul 2014 #35
Sometimes we can predict the future, or so common sense would dictate. Vattel Jul 2014 #38
Common sense is an oxymoron. riqster Jul 2014 #39
I understand Maryland.. My son lives there.. but you miss a large point Peacetrain Jul 2014 #40
good point Vattel Jul 2014 #58
Your ballot has more than one race on it. jeff47 Jul 2014 #51
true, some of the more local races are not as predictable. Vattel Jul 2014 #57
Nonsense. You don't have a governor? A state legislature? Local school boards? City councils? arcane1 Jul 2014 #78
I was thinking more of presidential and congressional elections, but you are right. Vattel Jul 2014 #86
And those local races affect your daily life more often than congress does. Plus, they redistrict stevenleser Jul 2014 #118
Exactly!! arcane1 Jul 2014 #119
Not voting is idiotic liberal N proud Jul 2014 #33
They screw us over by their inaction. riqster Jul 2014 #36
Foist a bad candidate on us and we must vote for them. Let us know how that works out for ya. L0oniX Jul 2014 #41
Fail to vote and you will get the worse of two evils. riqster Jul 2014 #43
That fear tactic is not going to work this time. L0oniX Jul 2014 #45
Fear, schmear. Let's talk facts. riqster Jul 2014 #60
Hell can freeze over ...and I will not vote for Hillary. L0oniX Jul 2014 #69
So I'll mark you down as "surrender", then. riqster Jul 2014 #70
Surrender to the corporate candidate then. Enjoy. L0oniX Jul 2014 #71
You'd rather roll over and enable the worst evil to triumph? riqster Jul 2014 #72
Your trying to force people to vote for someone they don't want in office. L0oniX Jul 2014 #75
Force, schmorce. Quit acting like you're being bullied. riqster Jul 2014 #77
Maybe you should try a different tact instead of forcing your "surrender" label crap on people. L0oniX Jul 2014 #81
I write my way. Other people write their way. riqster Jul 2014 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #73
If you don't vote for the Dem, you help the Repubs win. riqster Jul 2014 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #80
Does the candidate have to earn the vote at all? Deny and Shred Jul 2014 #84
I vote against Repubs. riqster Jul 2014 #90
It is a sad state of affairs Deny and Shred Jul 2014 #102
Sad indeed. We need to be more engaged in the primary process. riqster Jul 2014 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #135
Mine is a vote that has been cast for the benefit of the 99%. riqster Jul 2014 #137
You are not afraid of Republicans in office? treestar Jul 2014 #131
Then vote for a better candidate in the primary. jeff47 Jul 2014 #55
Should be an OP. riqster Jul 2014 #63
+1000000000000 LadyHawkAZ Jul 2014 #83
Now just add billionaire cash infusions and party insiders organizing to the left and you might TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #129
You'd have a point if the Republicans only changed after Citizen's United. jeff47 Jul 2014 #136
Why do you think I'm not voting in the primaries? I'm about rock solid a voter as you get. TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #139
As to write-in candidates; riqster Jul 2014 #141
Nothing helps Repubs more than implementation of their failed policies TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #143
Which happens far more often, the more of them there are in office. riqster Jul 2014 #144
Seems to happen with regularity regardless of who is in office though sometimes TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #145
I still say that Dems are better than Teapubbies. riqster Jul 2014 #146
I don't especially disagree with better but there is a more dangerous factor to be deeply concerned TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #147
I voted once or twice before 2008 LittleGirl Jul 2014 #42
Look at the Supreme Court. Five justices from Repubs. riqster Jul 2014 #44
Yes that's true LittleGirl Jul 2014 #46
Sure it will. Who was on the bench determined that we invaded Iraq. jeff47 Jul 2014 #53
Possibly. America has done a lot of damage around the world, though. riqster Jul 2014 #54
Richard said, "Withdrawal in disgust is not the same as apathy." lightcameron Jul 2014 #50
At the ballot box, the impact is the same. riqster Jul 2014 #65
I disagree Capt. Obvious Jul 2014 #52
I wouldn't mind so much if SANE Repubs voted. riqster Jul 2014 #68
after voting for over 40 years, i've seen little positive change noiretextatique Jul 2014 #62
I've seen lots of negative change. Caused mostly by Repub victories. riqster Jul 2014 #66
mostly...but not all noiretextatique Jul 2014 #124
True. But enabling the greater evil is anathema to me. riqster Jul 2014 #125
agreed noiretextatique Jul 2014 #126
We can change going forward by working harder in the primaries riqster Jul 2014 #127
agreed again eom noiretextatique Jul 2014 #128
Neither is voting for the status quo or politics-as-usual. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #64
That's exactly how the non-voting dumb-asses think: rebellion. arcane1 Jul 2014 #76
Yep. They forget how badly it's worked in the past. riqster Jul 2014 #112
Not voting is giving Teapublicans tacit permission Vogon_Glory Jul 2014 #85
More annoying than Dentrassis, eh? riqster Jul 2014 #111
It's stupidity. Owl Jul 2014 #89
That, too. riqster Jul 2014 #110
I never understand the no voting strategy. merrily Jul 2014 #96
Kick! Great line. I am going to steal it. Squinch Jul 2014 #103
As did I. riqster Jul 2014 #108
People who don't vote do so out of apathy. It's not 'to make a statement' it is the opposite of that Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #115
Refusing to vote is stupid and counterproductive. nt. Rex Jul 2014 #116
Yep. riqster Jul 2014 #117
I loved George Carlin as a comedian. He was a GENIUS at comedy. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #130
With people refusing to vote, Jamaal510 Jul 2014 #132
A good point. riqster Jul 2014 #133
For all those LWolf Jul 2014 #134
"I always vote. No matter what. Even if my choices are so rank that I have to write someone in." riqster Jul 2014 #138
Perhaps those not mentally equipped to see this aren't up to the task of hughee99 Jul 2014 #140
or it's simply not finding a candidate worthy of voting for. cali Jul 2014 #142
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Refusing to vote is...»Reply #117