General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Hillary Bashing" [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... and well-reasoned reply.
My "call out", if it can be deemed as such, was a reaction to the fact that too many here are responding to what they "assume" someone to mean, instead of actually reading what has been said.
Case in point:
About three weeks ago, two DUers got into a knock-down-drag-out subthread argument that got so vicious, it only ended when one of them (or perhaps both) got banned from the thread entirely. It was obvious at first glance that these two combatants were 100% in agreement with each other on the topic they were discussing.
However, the problem arose because each was responding to what they assumed the other was saying, instead of what was actually stated.
It went along the lines of: You're right. Anyone who doesn't see what's happening is an idiot," followed by, "So I'm an IDIOT? I don't SEE what's happening, meaning you think I turn a blind eye to this kind of behavior?"
It went on like that until the name-calling got so vicious, alerts were sent and one or both were thrown out of the discussion.
Like I said, there's a lot of "talking" on DU, and very little "listening".
I still wonder if those two DUers see each other as mortal enemies - when in truth they were on the same page all along.