Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)

10. Why isn't the girl being charged with the same thing?

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:35 AM

Jul 2014

Foster said the case began when the teen’s 15-year-old girlfriend sent photos of herself to the 17-year-old, who in turn sent her the video in question. The girl has not been charged, and her mother filed a complaint about the boy’s video, Foster said.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Prosecutors Ask Judge To Force Teen To Create Child Pornography In Order To Prosecute Him. [View all] RandySF Jul 2014 OP

WTF Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #1

If his attorney is smart. RandySF Jul 2014 #3

unless there is some sort of carve out jberryhill Jul 2014 #5

that's awful jberryhill Jul 2014 #2

Classy? Nope. longship Jul 2014 #4

as usual CreekDog Jul 2014 #7

The sophomoric boner argument trumps all? longship Jul 2014 #9

so if the prosecutors fiddle with the boy's genitals will THEY be arrested for underage sex? nt msongs Jul 2014 #6

If so, they deserve a stiff sentence. woolldog Jul 2014 #11

So it'd be legal for them to have sex but not sext? alp227 Jul 2014 #8

Why isn't the girl being charged with the same thing? davidn3600 Jul 2014 #10