Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)What Does the Democratic Party Actually Believe? [View all]
http://www.thenation.com/blog/180579/what-does-democratic-party-actually-believe
To put it crudely, the dilemma facing the Democratic party comes down to this: Will Dems decide next time to stand with the working people, or will they stick with their big-money friends in finance and business? Some twenty years ago, Bill Clinton taught Democrats how they can have it both ways. Take Wall Streets moneygobs of itwhile promising to govern on a heart-felt agenda of Putting People First.
It worked, sort of, for the party. Not so much for the people. New Democrats prevailed. Old labor-liberals lost their seat at the table. Among left-wing malcontents, Bill Clinton became slick Willie.
Now economic adversities have blown away the Clinton legacy, which is rightly blamed for much of what happened to middle-class wage earners. New voices like senators Elizabeth Warren and Sherod Brown are demanding a new new politicsbig governing reforms that really do put people first. The old New Dems are stuck with their moderation and obsolete economic doctrine that is utterly irrelevant amid the nations depressed circumstances.
Sooner or later I expect politics will change, because the injuries and adversities will not go away in the absence of stronger government interventions. For now, however, the Clintonites are the Democratic Party, having deliberately excluded liberal thinkers and activists from the ranks of government policymakers for two decades. Economic experts recruited by the Obama administration are more likely to have been trained at Goldman Sachs or Citigroup. They do not personally share the publics anger.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Extra-judicial drone killings, War&MIC, Banks, Big Oil, Off-shoring, and spying on US citizens. n/t
PowerToThePeople
Jul 2014
#1
Yes Kucinich did in fact, but Obama in contrast to Clinton promised a public option
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#42
Semantics? Really? "Any plan I sign must include" does not use the word veto but...
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#45
what a shocking development, a president didn't get everything in legislation
geek tragedy
Jul 2014
#46
I have been in several extended face-to-face arguments with mid-level bankers
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#15
They are mad because they know he is right on the merits, and they have no argument.
bemildred
Jul 2014
#18
I can't imagine how they'd feel if a true progressive were in the White House.
stillwaiting
Jul 2014
#54
Harper appears to share many a view with my good friend Sid, that'd be my guess.
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#31
No shit. When you're dismissing The Nation out of hand for it's agenda, it's probably time
Marr
Jul 2014
#66
C'mon, you can't expect "New Democrats" to be familiar with left-leaning publications.
Marr
Jul 2014
#67
no, the Clintonites are NOT the Democratic Party --- there are many anti-DLC/anti-Third Way
antigop
Jul 2014
#25
Your post conflates two separate entities - politicians and the Democratic Party.
sybylla
Jul 2014
#26
K&R / Until later when I may have time to comment. Good post X we need to discuss the elephant ITR
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#30
Dem voters believe in liberal policies and fighting conservatives. DC dems believe in nothing.
Doctor_J
Jul 2014
#39
As far as I can tell, it believes in getting elected and then getting reelected, and anything
djean111
Jul 2014
#56
It believes that as long as the Repubs are awful they can win by being "Not as bad".
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#58