General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Somewhere a bridge has gained its Troll back. [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I only knew Nikki and you a bit vaguely. Me and Zappaman? Who is that? I needed an answer, and I got it, we do not post in the correct threads explained the host. Th irony of those worried about NSA making lists of DUers here. ( And doing it inaccurately.) The end result is to deliberately discriminate against women and POC here.
I had falsely thought the hosts here arrived at a decision to ignore racism and sexism here because of something SKinner recently said, but this is not true. It was a deliberate effort of a few who have been convincing newer hosts "the rules" prevented them from using the SOP to lock some of the vilest threads we have seen posted here. It has reached the point where hosts side with trolls and denigrate alerters and DUers they do not like on a regular basis. They are wrong- and yes- not trult progressive at all. These rules makers pushed it a bit far with their "one strong leave" rule making consensus to lock anything impossible- that was the tipping point. I realized then the manipulation of hosts was quite intentional, and their aims became clear.
I am glad we were "grouped"now - it opened my eyes to the machinations of these few hosts, and the effect on GD as a whole.
Disturbing stuff.