Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

xchrom

(108,903 posts)

9. that's the architecture of policy.

Reply to joeglow3 (Reply #8)

Thu Jul 10, 2014, 11:38 AM

Jul 2014

there's not a lot to say about that -- other than it exposes how corporations in this instance avoid paying their taxes.

something we're all familiar with here.

that architecture is wrong.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Robert Reich: The New Way Big Corporations Like Walgreen Are Shamelessly Dodging Their Taxes [View all] xchrom Jul 2014 OP

We can't shame the shameless, they don't care. How long before we learn this and quit CK_John Jul 2014 #1

As a tax CPA, I wish there more details. LOTS of questions in this article joeglow3 Jul 2014 #2

how do so many significant corporations avoid taxes at all xchrom Jul 2014 #3

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you joeglow3 Jul 2014 #5

I hope you are willing to discuss joeglow3 Jul 2014 #6

I take it your silence means there is nothing wrong with the scenario I paint??? joeglow3 Jul 2014 #8

that's the architecture of policy. xchrom Jul 2014 #9

What is the correct architecture? joeglow3 Jul 2014 #10

Love it. No Representation without Taxation. no pay; no play. Viva_Daddy Jul 2014 #4

Makes perfect sense. nt BootinUp Jul 2014 #7

Gives new meaning to the phrase "take the money and run" doesn't it? Initech Jul 2014 #11

... xchrom Jul 2014 #12