General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NSA says Snowden e-mails exempt from public disclosure and secret [View all]Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)emails just obtained by Associated Press pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA) prove that senior Obama national security officials including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-NSA chief Keith Alexandernot only knew in advance that U.K. officials intended to force The Guardian to destroy their computers, but overtly celebrated it.
One email, dated July 19 (the day prior to the destruction) bears the subject line Guardian data being destroyed and is from NSA deputy director Richard Ledgett to Alexander. He writes: Good news, at least on this front. The next day, almost immediately after the computers were destroyed, Alexander emailed Ledgett: Can you confirm this actually occurred? Hours later, under the same subject line, Clapper emailed Alexander, saying: Thanks Keith
appreciate the conversation today.
Its hardly surprising that the Obama Administration was fully informed in advance: Its virtually inconceivable that notoriously subservient London officials would ever take any meaningful action without the advance knowledge and permission of their Washington overseers. There are, however, several notable points from these new disclosures:
(1) How many times do Obama administration officials have to be caught misleading the public before U.S. media outlets will stop assuming their claims to be true? Just this weekend, The Washington Post described the tens of thousands of FISA-collected emails that are in Snowden archive: the very material that Keith Alexander just two months ago unequivocally denied Snowden had obtained (Alexander: He didnt get this data. They didnt touch ; the New Yorker: The operational data?; Alexander: They didnt touch the FISA data
That database, he didnt have access to).
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/07/11/newly-obtained-emails-contradict-administration-claims-guardian-laptop-destruction/