Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NSA says Snowden e-mails exempt from public disclosure and secret [View all]TampaAnimusVortex
(785 posts)23. Crickets so far... /nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
387 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NSA says Snowden e-mails exempt from public disclosure and secret [View all]
Ichingcarpenter
Jul 2014
OP
Yeah, they kinda did...they said "we have them, but we're not showing them to you"...
truebrit71
Jul 2014
#289
Why anyone would trust the NSA is beyond me. Especially after Clapper's perjury.
morningfog
Jul 2014
#76
Lol, well considering the NSA denied that for a year, then 'suddenly' found ONE, I think we all
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#307
Yes, as I said, they 'suddenly found ONE' after denying ANY for a full year.
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#311
Well, let me see. Who should I trust more, Bush loyalists and appointees at the NSA or
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#314
Why is Bush loyalist and appointee, liar to Congress, Clapper, still head of the NSA?
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#316
I am stating facts. I did ask you several times why Clapper is still head of the NSA.
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#321
It's a logical fallacy to state that Bush Appointee, Clapper, who lied to Congress is still
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#323
I have stated, you resorted to a logical fallacy. The discussion is over. eom
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#324
No, this discussion will continue, with or without you because it is vitally important
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#325
I did ask a relevant question several times but received no response to it. Just mild personal
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#351
No worries, Snowden KEPT all his emails covering his ass legally on disclosing law breaking
uponit7771
Jul 2014
#10
And everybody seems to be missing the most important part of this denied request
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#36
but it's all nice and legal, and that's all that really matters in the eyes of the authoritarian..
frylock
Jul 2014
#51
And the FISA court judges are appointed by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
neverforget
Jul 2014
#147
The Snowden detractors actually posted the article. Then went with it big time
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#134
Cali Democrat who posted the article itself is an ardent anti-Snowden poster!
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#136
I gave you examples of threads where anti- Snowden posters brought those topics into the discussion
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#217
Google "Snowden girlfriend Democraticunderground June 2013". There are MANY threads
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#120
I never understood why his defenders crafted the strawman that there was something wrong with what
MADem
Jul 2014
#175
Yup. They own it now. Even more so as they persist with lame Snowden/ Greenwald smears.
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#220
Correct, your half of discussion was about pretending there isn't a smear campaign
bobduca
Jul 2014
#380
I attacked Snowden for boxes? Or was it his neighbors? Or was it another DUer?
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2014
#260
So where are the DUers disparaging Snowden for having boxes in his garage?
Cali_Democrat
Jul 2014
#249
It's been two months since he claimed there were other emails. You'd think he would
MADem
Jul 2014
#230
The NSA, after denying for a year that there were emails, suddenly found 'one'. Now they
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#300
You are wrong. I wrote: 'Booz Allen Hamilton is owned by Carlyle Group, a subsidiary of the BFEE.'
Octafish
Jul 2014
#54
No 'CT' smear at all. The Bush Family Evil Empire represents the Fascist Heart of Power
Octafish
Jul 2014
#75
Jesus then put him on ignore instead of spamming the DISCUSSION board with this shit
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#122
I posted and showed where you're wrong without you once refuting what I wrote.
Octafish
Jul 2014
#145
This seems so familiar. What was your old DU screen name? I know I know you.
morningfog
Jul 2014
#80
No more than Ford and dozens of other corporate owners who invested in Germany. eom
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#294
Tragic. I bet you fully supported Octafish right up until that very instant.
RufusTFirefly
Jul 2014
#114
It was a fill in the blank email that specifically referenced training Snowden received.
MADem
Jul 2014
#177
"Bullshit" isn't a rebuttal. It's an expression of your personal vexation, nothing more.
MADem
Jul 2014
#204
most importantly, it would expose the NSA lying their asses off about Snowden's emails..
frylock
Jul 2014
#22
So you think the NSA claimed Snowden didn't write ANY emails at all at any time?????
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#42
we have not found any evidence to support Mr. Snowden’s contention that he brought these matters..
frylock
Jul 2014
#53
It's like a rerun of the "Whitey tape" BS I saw all over the internet in 2008.
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#156
Snowden should just release the emails he claims exists and it will all be cleared up.
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#38
If they're not doing anything WRONG, then they've got nothing to HIDE !!!
blkmusclmachine
Jul 2014
#62
Putin and Snowden have a mutual admiration society.. Pooite loves what Snowden does..
Cha
Jul 2014
#239
He should just do it if he has them--this "Nanny, nanny boo boo" game is childish.
MADem
Jul 2014
#172
Yeah, he's "messaging" so well that his supporters are getting all strident and angry.
MADem
Jul 2014
#222
I'm just calling it as I see it, I am not "sniping." YMMV, we might as well just leave it there. nt
MADem
Jul 2014
#364
We're going to be hearing more about government data that's backed up, in the coming days, imo (nt)
Babel_17
Jul 2014
#214
That's why I posted what I posted: The Big Picture is NSA LIES to its supposed bosses...
Octafish
Jul 2014
#283
While I save my condescension for conservatives, I do hold in contempt all who support the Lie.
Octafish
Jul 2014
#350
When someone is caught lying, as the NSA were, for over a year when they denied he had
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#302
What is ludicrous is that the NSA has consistently lied to the American people all the way back to
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#358
The NSA stated a year or more ago, that there was 'no paper trail' between them and Snowden
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#361
Raising concerns with superiors (which is what Chelsea Manning did also) and going
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#366
Yes, where to begin indeed. The NSA LIED about ANY emails from Snowden for a FULL YEAR. THEN
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#375
Look, you can try to defend them all you want, but the fact is they DENIED any emails to various
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#382
Not 'we', you are ignoring all the links provided for you where the NSA, according to
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#384
At this point, believing anything the NSA says is naive, not to mention ludicrous.
djean111
Jul 2014
#326
Evidently criticizing anything while Obama is president is bad chi or something.
djean111
Jul 2014
#337
But but but...boxes and stripper polls! It is sad how desperate the apologists for the NSA are
Rex
Jul 2014
#345
Poles. Stripper Poles. Really need to be aware of spelling, which can change meaning on DU.
Octafish
Jul 2014
#365