Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
60. Not with you....no
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jul 2014

I read the post that was deleted, and if you think that's what belongs in a discussion among serious people, then my answer is no. I can't have a discussion with you about race -- uncomfortable or otherwise.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i would have left that hate post up there Enrique Jul 2014 #1
I love helping people think for themselves FrodosPet Jul 2014 #4
could you explain why you felt that posting someone who openly advocates for genocide cali Jul 2014 #18
For one, it helps define the edges FrodosPet Jul 2014 #55
no it's not. so then Goebbel's voice had validity? No. cali Jul 2014 #56
hateful voices dont count Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #61
Depends how you define "hateful." I agree that complete maniacs sholud probably be ignored. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #64
that I agree on Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #69
Fringe crackpots are not worth your time. joshcryer Jul 2014 #2
This old white man says we need to madokie Jul 2014 #3
Reread the fourth paragraph. joshcryer Jul 2014 #5
Without doubt n/t etherealtruth Jul 2014 #14
I tried reading that three times. bluedigger Jul 2014 #35
Pretty close to gibberish..I inserted words in the text where maybe there was a misspelling..... Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #50
you really should know the context of this. cali Jul 2014 #11
I am not advocating genocide FrodosPet Jul 2014 #53
Well here we agree- too many people who are racist deny it, but cali Jul 2014 #57
I thought I was kicking myself in the ass FrodosPet Jul 2014 #59
You know what? I completely agree with this post. But you still picked a bad example. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #65
not if you try and start out that conversation with a passage from a hateful sick bigot cali Jul 2014 #6
Yeah, I saw that. It was revolting n/t Violet_Crumble Jul 2014 #13
Insanity should not be legitimized Generic Brad Jul 2014 #36
I have no idea JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #7
Yeah,some backround would be nice.nt sufrommich Jul 2014 #8
FrodosPet's OP was hidden by a jury muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #9
Thanks n/t JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #10
Fighting racism with racism is a sure way to lose people who pipoman Jul 2014 #12
You really believe the OP that was hidden was something ... etherealtruth Jul 2014 #15
It sure doesn't. I prefer to give FP the benefit of the doubt here cali Jul 2014 #16
I was hoping this OP would shed some light on it etherealtruth Jul 2014 #17
I just asked the op something along those lines cali Jul 2014 #19
I really want to know the rationale of your posting the op that was locked cali Jul 2014 #20
I suspect it is someone who believes racism is pipoman Jul 2014 #22
maybe or maybe not. but that blog isn't just racist, it's as crazy as anything one could possibly cali Jul 2014 #23
It's not "a malady of a single race." It's a system set up to benefit one race at the expense of nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #66
What it looks like gollygee Jul 2014 #21
That's what it looks like to me too. Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #25
thanks golly. i was not getting what was going on. my post can stand, since it was neutral'ish. nt seabeyond Jul 2014 #30
I'd like to think his intentions were more positive than that. Still, you have a point. n/t nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #67
No. of course not. reddread Jul 2014 #24
the op posted from one of the most hate filled and batshit insane sites one can find cali Jul 2014 #26
for a discussion on racism? sounds perfectly appropriate reddread Jul 2014 #29
look, you cannot post a thread calling for honest discussion using something cali Jul 2014 #31
why not tell me here? reddread Jul 2014 #38
fine. it'll probably get deleted but here cali Jul 2014 #39
And don't forget the interview spewing misinformation about HIV and the black community. moriah Jul 2014 #49
oh, and if you believe in genocide, you should be booted unceremoniously from DU. period. cali Jul 2014 #40
WAS THAT NECESSARY? reddread Jul 2014 #41
I'm sorry, but you were legitimizing the most repugnant shit without having read it cali Jul 2014 #42
like holy hell I was reddread Jul 2014 #43
Now that you've seen an excerpt from the website, in #39, what do you think of it? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #44
Yes. I think dialog on racism is vital. I particularly think discussing reparations is important cali Jul 2014 #45
Do you mean you actually read that and find it an acceptable way to start a discussion? cali Jul 2014 #46
havent read anything reddread Jul 2014 #63
The more I think about it, the more I find your op here- really, really absurd cali Jul 2014 #27
The Charlie Manson theory of "Helter Skelter" nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #33
my boys were raised in a socially aware, respectful house. conversation always. thought, insight. seabeyond Jul 2014 #28
You think screaming "Helter Skelter--the blacks want to kill us" geek tragedy Jul 2014 #32
Apparently not... TreasonousBastard Jul 2014 #34
re-read this op more carefully. I don't think that was his/her point. cali Jul 2014 #37
There are people with hostile, angry, and fearful ideas and attitudes across the human spectrum FrodosPet Jul 2014 #51
well, you didn't shake me. you sickened me. I think you are really full of yourself cali Jul 2014 #58
Umm, probably not. nt Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #47
You want me to think for myself. LWolf Jul 2014 #48
Predictable nonsense from you. Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #52
I think the President had some pretty wise things to say about this... Hippo_Tron Jul 2014 #54
Not with you....no Jeff In Milwaukee Jul 2014 #60
I was playing golf. What is everyone talking about? AngryAmish Jul 2014 #62
Not with someone who likes to post kiva Jul 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we have an open, perh...»Reply #60