Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
20. You are most welcome, Uncle Joe! Here's why the Paper of Record always is on Record for War...
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 08:54 PM
Jul 2014


The Gulf of Tonkin Incident.



The Newspaper of War

by Howard Friel
Published on Tuesday, May 13, 2014 by Common Dreams

Many years ago, Ho Chi Minh’s North Vietnam, Communist China, and Soviet Russia were saying one thing about what had happened in the Gulf of Tonkin in early August 1964, while President Johnson and top administration officials were all saying the exact opposite. How should the Times have responded to that situation, assuming a commitment to an independent press and an informed citizenry?

Ten years earlier, in July 1954, the governments of Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and China all signed the Final Declaration of the Geneva Accord on Vietnam, which formally concluded France’s U.S.-supported colonial war in Vietnam. The United States refused to sign, and thereafter proceeded to undermine the most important stipulation of the accord – that elections to unify the northern and southern zones of Vietnam take place in 1956. By what journalistic criteria should the New York Times have covered this refusal by the Eisenhower administration to sign and comply with the Geneva Accord on Vietnam, which opened the door to the twenty-year American military campaign in Vietnam?

When Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, and Rice claimed in 2001-2003 that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, including an active nuclear weapons program, and when Saddam Hussein denied those claims, what journalistic standard did the Times apply in its response to those conflicting claims?

Journalism schools should teach a course focused on questions like these, given that over the past sixty years the Times and every other mainstream news organization has repeatedly flunked such tests, in each instance aiding the government’s efforts in its illegal interventions and wars.

SNIP...

On April 4, 2003, while witnessing the U.S. bombing of Baghdad, Times correspondent John F. Burns, wrote: “American air power, as the 21st century begins, is a terrible swift sword that strikes with a suddenness, a devastation and a precision, in most cases, that moves even agnostics to reach for words associated with the power of gods.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/05/13-0



This is the "paper of record" that gave us Judith Miller and aluminum tubes in 2002, while failing to mention word that George W Bush's illegal domestic spying operation until after Selection 2004. I also want to emphasize this paper has done all it can to keep up the fiction that Lee Harvey Oswald alone shot President John F. Kennedy, who had ordered withdrawal of the U.S. from Vietnam. In addition, this is an important read for those interested in seeing how Corporate McPravda exclusively serves the warmongers and not the People, as intended by the nation's Founders in the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why that matters for democracy: Carlyle Group owns Booz Allen Hamilton, NSA contractor. Octafish Jul 2014 #1
don't look G_j Jul 2014 #15
WikiLeaks' Stratfor Dump Lifts Lid on Intelligence-Industrial Complex Octafish Jul 2014 #29
Remember, It's OK for Government Insiders to Make Money off their Connections Octafish Jul 2014 #2
Which explains why ''Money Trumps Peace.'' Octafish Jul 2014 #3
A Racket as Old as Empire. Octafish Jul 2014 #4
thanks for your diligence, Octafish. grasswire Jul 2014 #5
You are most welcome, grasswire. I wonder why they get so angry? Octafish Jul 2014 #7
Important imperative information to fully understand the Middle east issues. K&R nt riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #6
Thank you, riderinthestorm! Here's Grandpa Prescott's take on Iraq from 1959... Octafish Jul 2014 #8
Kicked and recommended! I believe every fucking word of this. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #9
The Bush Crime Family is pretty well diversified I must say. All of it Evil. rickyhall Jul 2014 #10
A ''multi-generational family of fibbers'' is how Kevin Phillips politely pegged them. Octafish Jul 2014 #14
War = Profit blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #11
Justice for Westhusing Octafish Jul 2014 #16
Where the hell are Hillary's defenders? Hello? Scuba Jul 2014 #12
Remembering Team B Octafish Jul 2014 #17
Thanks, Octafish, I had never heard of Team B. Scuba Jul 2014 #18
You are most welcome, Scuba! Preventing the Peace Dividend is buy-partisan. Octafish Jul 2014 #19
"Buy-partisan". How appropriate. Scuba Jul 2014 #21
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #13
You are most welcome, Uncle Joe! Here's why the Paper of Record always is on Record for War... Octafish Jul 2014 #20
Don't they have the motto. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #22
That's how the assassination of President Kennedy changed so much for the United States... Octafish Jul 2014 #26
K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2014 #23
This thread should be pinned somewhere. Great OP, and great responses tying together Squinch Jul 2014 #24
kick woo me with science Jul 2014 #25
But Hillary is just trying to make a living! Thanks, Octafish. K&R. nt antigop Jul 2014 #27
Sunday morning kick grasswire Jul 2014 #28
Kick grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»War is Swell: the Carlyle...»Reply #20