General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NSA says Snowden e-mails exempt from public disclosure and secret [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Throughout this sub-thread, I have asked - SPECIFICALLY and REPEATEDLY - for links to posts by Snowden detractors who raised the specific topics of pole dancing GFs and/or boxes in the garage.
This discussion was NEVER about anything else but that very specific topic. It was NEVER about anti-Snowden OPs, comments, articles, replies, etc.
"As I said in my first post, they are no longer used by the anti-Snowden crowd."
The term "no longer used" implies that they WERE used by Snowden detractors at some point.
Again, I ask you to post links to any Snowden detractor using any specific reference to pole-dancing GFs or boxes in the garage in a thread about Snowden.
This is not the first time DUers have been challenged to do so. And not a single link has ever been provided to support that claim.
"The fact that they didn't continue to use these points of attack after being so severely slapped down is hardly surprising."
Again, provide the links to comments about pole-dancing GFs and/or boxes in the garage that were, as you claim, "smacked down".
And YET AGAIN - just so we're perfectly clear - I am asking for specific comments from Snowden detractors to pole-dancing GFs and/or boxes in the garage - not to other anti-Snowden comments that you might find offensive or trivia, but SPECIFIC REFERENCES to THOSE terms.