DOJ, anti-trust, AT&T and T-mobile

[suffragette]

8. Well you were clearly correct

and it is good to see a stand being made on that issue through this case.

There have been so many years of pushes to redefine concepts/terms, 1984 naming and spin.
It's left some people confused, some stirring confusion and many sceptical/cynical.

You made me remember just now my PoliSci 101 instructor. Instead of just using a standard textbook, he chose an assortment of texts, all from specific points of view and we thoroughly examined and discussed what the points of view were and what the author's goals, so context as well as contents. We had one standard text (used as a reference piece mostly, but not accepted unquestioningly - which was his point), Machiavelli's "The Prince," "Nine Nations of North America" and a book whose title I don't recall that was written from a favorable stance on Reagan, who was President at the time. The latter book was one many in the class (not me - but I was in the minority there) would have read uncritically otherwise, but given his construction of the class, the students had to critically examine it, which also meant examining his policies in light of "The Prince" rather than the spin. Great class.