Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It made no difference whether their letters, papers and effects came from France, England or [View all]Uncle Joe
(65,142 posts)41. I hope so, that would be a great post!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It made no difference whether their letters, papers and effects came from France, England or [View all]
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
OP
That's an excellent analysis, and well worth reading, questioneverything, but the Roberts led S.C.
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
#6
Thanks Uncle Joe. I don't understand the claim that the ACLU 'doesn't have standing'. They are
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#11
True the Roberts Court is protecting the violators but they're not the only ones, sadly.
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#14
I have no doubt, it's emotionally difficult to say the least, to oppose someone that you
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
#17
I understand that, as it was difficult for me to acknowledge a lot of what I could not ignore, as
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#18
Hell, some of the traitors actually consider the threat as something of a feature
TheKentuckian
Jul 2014
#49
And yet Gen. Hayden insisted that the amendment doesn't include the phrase "probable cause"
RufusTFirefly
Jul 2014
#4
And to think he took an oath to 'defend and protect the US Constitution from all enemies, both
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#15
But it's okay if 'our guy' does it because 'our guy' wouldn't ever use it for evil, only good...
truebrit71
Jul 2014
#40
That's amazing, I had not seen that. I just mentioned that phrase above because it's clear that
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#12
It is not "tens of thousands of Americans" it is EVERYONE hundreds of millions of Americans and
Vincardog
Jul 2014
#42
Yes, I know and I share your anger at all of it. I was talking specifically about their
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#43
We have been living in a lawless state for decades, it is only now the "average man" is starting to
Vincardog
Jul 2014
#44
Too Sad That More Americans Are Unfamiliar With The Fourth Amendment - Thank You For Sharing
cantbeserious
Jul 2014
#10
Thurgood Marshall saw much of this coming when he dissented in the Maryland case.
suffragette
Jul 2014
#35
Thanks for the kick and rec, DeSwiss and while I agree with some of what Peter Joseph states there,
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
#23
But it's not the same document, it has been altered and it will continue to be. I believe we
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
#32
I've seen the excuse put forward on DU that its just too hard to separate out the illegal stuff
riderinthestorm
Jul 2014
#26
Thank you, riderinthestorm, for a nation that sent humans to the moon, robots to Mars
Uncle Joe
Jul 2014
#29