General Discussion

intaglio

(8,170 posts)

139. I have seen no personal attack on you in this thread

Wed Jul 16, 2014, 06:43 AM

Jul 2014

This is not an opinion it is an observation.

You have, at length, stated your opinion but, despite your protestations about not objecting to others opinions, you have objected, at length.

You acknowledge the right of others to their opinion but object to them either acting on that opinion or stating why they have that opinion.

You state you wish to stick to issues but then venture into extensive diversions about how you are hard done by.

You have stated that others opinions about you do not bother you but then complain that they are "insulting you" when they express that opinion.

My personal belief is that you are guilty of failing to examine your preconceptions critically and that failure has rendered you purblind to more modern perceptions. A 18th century poet expressing his view of the female gender will, almost always, be expressing views that are objectionable to modern audiences just as highly acclaimed early 20th century white, male authors will be guilty of paternalism (at best) towards women and other races.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

320 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned is sexist [View all] cali Jul 2014 OP

Good post, cali... DonViejo Jul 2014 #1

Agreed. arcane1 Jul 2014 #2

I wish I could say I was amazed BainsBane Jul 2014 #13

Well, take a look at reply #3. (nt) jeff47 Jul 2014 #17

I am not, I have found lots of rightwing thinking on this site randys1 Jul 2014 #51

Can we go after Shakespeare next? Comrade Grumpy Jul 2014 #3

Why? LisaLynne Jul 2014 #4

Does he post sexist idioms on DU? cyberswede Jul 2014 #5

what's your point? cali Jul 2014 #6

Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #41

Has nothing to do with literary works. Let alone from centuries ago. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #7

It's called derail and distract BainsBane Jul 2014 #8

I just don't know why anyone would bother. You'd think they'd have better things to do nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #10

You don't understand BainsBane Jul 2014 #12

It's almost like a reflex. Responding to a certain subject with defensiveness every. single. time. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #14

Yes. You should do that right now. Go on! Scoot! Squinch Jul 2014 #23

You can go after anyone as long as you misquote them first. IronLionZion Jul 2014 #197

Here is the full quote awake Jul 2014 #9

Which is what cali already posted in her OP... cyberswede Jul 2014 #15

cali, I was on that jury .... Scuba Jul 2014 #11

thanks so much for your post Scuba. cali Jul 2014 #16

You're welcome. This is one of the reasons I love DU. I learned something today. Scuba Jul 2014 #19

"It seems obvious to me in the same way that "Muslims don't renounce terrorism" is obvious." redqueen Jul 2014 #20

I don't agree with you, as a woman. And as a woman, I acknowledge the right of others to disagree sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #21

it's more than opinion. It;s a sentiment that wrongly characterizes women cali Jul 2014 #24

Well stated. Raine1967 Jul 2014 #29

You are expressing YOUR opinion of what someone means when they use the phrase. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #31

It's "only an opinion" kcr Jul 2014 #46

"It's such a pat dismissal." MerryBlooms Jul 2014 #57

Um, did you mean to direct that question to those who ARE stating that the opinions of others sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #82

No, I meant you. kcr Jul 2014 #87

I think you just contradicted yourself. Didn't YOU just accuse ME, wrongfully as I pointed out sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #105

Yes. Some opinions are valid, some not. No contradiction. kcr Jul 2014 #106

That's your opinion, which you're entitle to, no matter how wrong you are in MY equally sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #109

Being entitled to an opinion doesn't make you right. kcr Jul 2014 #110

And visa versa! AgingAmerican Jul 2014 #125

Very true! kcr Jul 2014 #157

Nor does it make you right. Its just your opinion as well. LaurenG Jul 2014 #219

And my point is so what? kcr Jul 2014 #226

OK LaurenG Jul 2014 #228

Some people seem to have a problem with that. kcr Jul 2014 #231

I agree with your opinion Sabrina notadmblnd Jul 2014 #126

I have seen no personal attack on you in this thread intaglio Jul 2014 #139

"I simply think you don't get it- about so very many things." jberryhill Jul 2014 #252

It is someone's perception of why a particular person does not understand how others see things intaglio Jul 2014 #280

What personal attack? NCTraveler Jul 2014 #241

" I simply think you don't get it- about so very many things." jberryhill Jul 2014 #251

Compared to what she throws out there, no. Not in any way. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #256

there are two types of statements.... jberryhill Jul 2014 #260

I don't care about being attacked, just to be clear, that has never stopped me from stating my sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #254

Are there any posts of yours in this thread containing more than seven pronouns? NCTraveler Jul 2014 #258

Of course, my posts contain plenty of pronouns, but they are usually descriptive sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #259

I also don't find it sexist pipi_k Jul 2014 #61

And I Don't RobinA Jul 2014 #150

then why is it such a joke, a giggle, a chuckle for men? wink wink. jab in rib. ha ha. nt seabeyond Jul 2014 #151

'Cause RobinA Jul 2014 #165

oh. ya right. you think you are pulling the wool over the mens eyes. so as they insult you. seabeyond Jul 2014 #166

I Thought RobinA Jul 2014 #172

because this notion that women are all that in irrational and emotional doesnt effect our real life seabeyond Jul 2014 #187

every one of your posts starts, woman here, and no misogyny or sexism at all. really. every one. seabeyond Jul 2014 #37

Thanks for your comment. I am proud to be a woman. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #38

right sabrina. that is the point. i object to women declaring their gender. you got me. seabeyond Jul 2014 #39

"You object to women declaring their gender on the internet " sufrommich Jul 2014 #66

Why would someone even comment on another woman stating that she is a woman? sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #80

It wasn't hard to understand at all. Sea stated that you preface sufrommich Jul 2014 #89

So you are saying that because I don't agree that a literary quote is sexist sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #92

Why? kcr Jul 2014 #108

You are upset that a woman states she is a woman? Wow! sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #115

Your opinion that those you disagree with seem to think they speak for all women kcr Jul 2014 #119

They don't speak for all women due to the fact that women like me among others sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #121

Right, we got it. Women like Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman boston bean Jul 2014 #144

Because they're Just Your Opinions kcr Jul 2014 #229

Apparently It Does RobinA Jul 2014 #170

Thank you Robin. I believe the objection to a woman who disagrees with the supposed status quo sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #193

I've never been raped kcr Jul 2014 #199

+1 nt NCTraveler Jul 2014 #242

You, Sabrina, are one of the strongest, most intelligent, able women I 'know' polly7 Jul 2014 #86

I think your posts are demonstrative of the issue laundry_queen Jul 2014 #93

I respect you too and enjoy your posts. We simply disagree on this. I am fully aware sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #97

The words may not hurt you laundry_queen Jul 2014 #111

There are no insults in that post, unless you want there to be. Someone disagreeing with you is sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #118

The insulting was done by the person whose language you are defending BainsBane Jul 2014 #154

yes. "more easily offended by objections to sexism than sexism itself?" seabeyond Jul 2014 #156

Don't try to conflate these two issues, they are entirely separate which several sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #232

Thank you for getting to the ... prairierose Jul 2014 #257

+100 smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #266

Thank you for reading.... prairierose Jul 2014 #309

excellent post, queen. i have not delved in this thread, but, i would make your point. looking at seabeyond Jul 2014 #143

If it isn't offensive, it ought to be. How a person reacts to rejection is a matter of personality, Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #49

Quotes from anonymous, ignorant people on the internet have zero effect on me. Is there some sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #76

This is something pipi_k Jul 2014 #96

Good post, thank you! sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #98

+1000 notadmblnd Jul 2014 #127

Goodie for you. Black people are lazy. Mexicans are dirty. Women are irrational. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #131

The point is, many feel and agree that the quote portrays Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #158

That is your opinion and to you it makes sense. I respect that. Mine happens to be different. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #164

you call women weak and victims if they speak out. now, you are calling women bullies if they speak seabeyond Jul 2014 #168

I talk about women's issues in RL and on other forums. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #270

You blamed women on du for not participating in discussions about women's issues. 3 groups we do not seabeyond Jul 2014 #274

Why are you fighting with me? You made a comment, I responded with sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #275

no sabrina. you are not respectful. that is the problem. not even a little. your posts of full seabeyond Jul 2014 #283

Disagreeing with someone, stating a difference opinion, is not disrespectful. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #285

but you do ascribe nefarious motive to those that disagree with you and you do repeatedly seabeyond Jul 2014 #286

Yep. Quite the cognitive dissonance. JTFrog Jul 2014 #287

totally.... seabeyond Jul 2014 #288

I did ask you I believe for examples of what you are claiming. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #294

Correction: that would be "affects" smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #267

To me, it is offensive. Jamastiene Jul 2014 #208

Thank you...I am so weary of being scorned for not being upset over likesmountains 52 Jul 2014 #88

Lol, don't worry, you are far from alone! sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #94

I think you could have worked "I'm a woman" in to that post a few more times. jeff47 Jul 2014 #107

Well, if you had asked me sooner, I would have done it, as a woman, just for you. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #112

They are not being admonished for saying they ARE woman. They are being admonished jeff47 Jul 2014 #114

How dare you accuse me of using my gender as a shield. I should alert on this sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #116

And there you do it again. jeff47 Jul 2014 #117

Your comments to me as a woman here are sexist. You are using that old 'shame on you' routine sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #120

No, they're not. They're recounting what you've actually done in this thread. jeff47 Jul 2014 #122

You have done worse than tell me I have no right to an opinion, you have deliberatley sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #124

Wait, remind me again. Are you a woman? smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #134

uh oh. i think she is making all women look weak and i think we are suppose to get pissed about it. seabeyond Jul 2014 #147

Yeah, sea... Bobbie Jo Jul 2014 #159

it truly was a wtf moment for me this morning. thank you. thank you for seabeyond Jul 2014 #167

Yes, of course. It's kind of sad, isn't i? smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #269

The nice thing about a message board is it's impossible to mischaracterize an argument jeff47 Jul 2014 #175

I'm truly sorry that there are actually people here who are offended by a woman stating sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #186

It's not that you have opinions as a woman. smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #216

Sure it is, it's about women who don't bow down to bullying and most people here know it sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #217

You did good. LaurenG Jul 2014 #225

Holy crap Bobbie Jo Jul 2014 #212

omg... sabrina. go up adn read those posts, right above that you just posted. i cannot seabeyond Jul 2014 #146

She never reads beyond about the 3rd sentence in a reply. jeff47 Jul 2014 #177

ya know. now we are pretending that the conditioned belief that women are emotional and irrational seabeyond Jul 2014 #188

I also agree with Sabrina LaurenG Jul 2014 #220

bully for you lauren. terrible affront? hardly. do not make more of it than what it is. seabeyond Jul 2014 #221

You are the ones making this a bad bunch of words so bully for you! LaurenG Jul 2014 #222

i will say once then out of here. we are discussing a term, coined long ago when women were property seabeyond Jul 2014 #224

Go hog wild? LaurenG Jul 2014 #238

hog wild as in.... last word. i would not be back in but feels like i am being set up for hides so, seabeyond Jul 2014 #240

Come on LaurenG Jul 2014 #245

tsk tsk... how dare? isnt that showing weakens? you are singlehadnedly taking down all women with seabeyond Jul 2014 #145

You noticed that too? LOL! smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #268

This Is My RobinA Jul 2014 #149

Are you mercuryblues Jul 2014 #235

Search the site, and you'll find it used a fair amount muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #18

It isn't. It's an opinion, and we are all entitled to opinions. I do not find it sexist, as a matter sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #22

so then it's opinion that Muslims have a predilection for terrorism and generally don't condemn it? cali Jul 2014 #32

Why do you assume that 'scorn' always relates to men when it comes to women? Women sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #33

But the quote is specifically about women's supposed fury *over men.* DeadLetterOffice Jul 2014 #67

The quote is used for many different reasons in today's world. Personally I don't care much how sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #73

Thank you! polly7 Jul 2014 #77

I know, never give anyone that kind of power over you, imo. I am shocked at sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #83

When women speak out to say you are not going to speak to me like that, you are not going seaglass Jul 2014 #141

men say that as a jab at women, for a little chuckle. we are bascially being told, the strong woman seabeyond Jul 2014 #148

Thank you! smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #272

Can I add my two cents? Generic Other Jul 2014 #81

Good post, Generic Other, very well said. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #100

There's a problem with that argument. jeff47 Jul 2014 #113

Where In This Quote RobinA Jul 2014 #179

Then you don't know what it means treestar Jul 2014 #230

Well, it's a princess telling a captive she will have him killed muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #236

He's dead, it's literature. And I like that women can be viewed as forces to be sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #255

She is not being viewed as a force to be reckoned with treestar Jul 2014 #278

that is mercuryblues Jul 2014 #289

when men are laughing their ass off at you, to your face, pretty well know it is not a compliment. seabeyond Jul 2014 #290

yup mercuryblues Jul 2014 #291

someone down thread said, women are this, own it. (a woman said that). no. seabeyond Jul 2014 #292

I use everything I can for the benefit of women. Do you have a problem with sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #293

my counter mercuryblues Jul 2014 #295

It just doesn't offend most women, sorry you are upset over that. And yes, I will use every tool sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #296

When a women uses it, they are defining THEMSELVES as irrational and vengeful because that is Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #299

+1 mercuryblues Jul 2014 #308

LOL mercuryblues Jul 2014 #307

I've gone very far with it and find that when you take the power away from those who sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #310

you do allow others power if you behave in a poor manner just to try to get something over them. seabeyond Jul 2014 #311

That's confusing. To me, those behaving in a poor manner are those trying to insult sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #315

No mercuryblues Jul 2014 #313

You sound very hostile, and all because I don't agree with you. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #314

that sounds mercuryblues Jul 2014 #316

Lol, the irony. 'Why are you ascribing emotions to me'! sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #317

Not once mercuryblues Jul 2014 #318

Why the personal attack? What part of mercuryblues seem hostile? Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #319

Thank you. It is often used as an insult because it perpetuates the stereotype that women do not Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #297

supposedly, i think the argument is, we are that and we need to use it as a tool to be strong, seabeyond Jul 2014 #298

I don't get it either. Defining women as irrationally violent with rage when they are rejected IS Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #301

i do not see it as... lol. for sure. lol. ah ha. i am glad some are interpreting seabeyond Jul 2014 #303

I've alerted on the phrase a couple of times and it's been hidden BainsBane Jul 2014 #26

it's about how women cannot act rationally in the face of rejection from a man. how is that NOT cali Jul 2014 #27

'fury' is not necessarily 'irrational' muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #30

I can't agree. I think the general sense of the phrase in context and as it's been historicallly cali Jul 2014 #34

In the context of how that phrase is commonly used, irrational is the implication. kcr Jul 2014 #50

Exactly. Wasn't it recently laundry_queen Jul 2014 #95

No... RobinA Jul 2014 #181

Well, thinking something isn't harmless, is it? kcr Jul 2014 #207

It is stupid. Why do we hear so much about men murdering the women who try to divorce/leave them, smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #55

My first thought too. nt sufrommich Jul 2014 #69

You called it right, Cali. yallerdawg Jul 2014 #25

here is another that goes along what you say, woman scorned. all women are liars. seabeyond Jul 2014 #28

My wife actually uses that phrase (not about me, but herself). We have a bit madinmaryland Jul 2014 #35

Groan... is this why a jury hid my post? Quantess Jul 2014 #36

quantess..... i love you. seabeyond Jul 2014 #40

Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #43

lol. that woman? i would have called her stupid. that was all she was to me. stupid. seabeyond Jul 2014 #44

I do not get the sensitivity to the "b" word. Quantess Jul 2014 #48

Neither have I. F4lconF16 Jul 2014 #132

Thank you! smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #271

I believe in you, seabeyond, I really do. Quantess Jul 2014 #54

lol. i am gonna get back to you. seabeyond Jul 2014 #56

Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #42

Is it so hilarious? Quantess Jul 2014 #45

I think the point is that you can call them "horrible" spooky3 Jul 2014 #123

You are correct. JEFF9K Jul 2014 #185

challenge the democratic administration to your free speech of rw talking points. i dare you. seabeyond Jul 2014 #190

What the eff are you talking about? JEFF9K Jul 2014 #209

"this site shackles free speech and free thought." challenge the democratic administration to your seabeyond Jul 2014 #213

Please explain how what you said even begins to make sense. JEFF9K Jul 2014 #214

you are yelling about your free speech being shackled. oh the outrage. so, tell skinner not being seabeyond Jul 2014 #215

The non right wing members gain from it. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #246

Claiming that a quote from an significant playwright or author renders it harmless intaglio Jul 2014 #47

Jeez it's a figure of speech Gman Jul 2014 #52

Did someone actually defend a sexist phrase with geek tragedy Jul 2014 #53

bah hahahaha. it is a guy thing you all. you know, sexist shit. just a guy thing. lol. nt seabeyond Jul 2014 #60

It's starting to get ridiculous around here. . truebrit71 Jul 2014 #63

Delayed super-moon stuff, I guess Gman Jul 2014 #65

A figure of speech that generalizes about women treestar Jul 2014 #78

It isn't sexist because it's a guy thing? jeff47 Jul 2014 #104

This message was self-deleted by its author Gman Jul 2014 #58

You can put Congrieve's phrase in the context you want Gman Jul 2014 #59

more men murder women when scorned. few women do shit when scorned, besides leave. it is bullshit, seabeyond Jul 2014 #62

The fact that the guy likely deserves the wrath aside Gman Jul 2014 #64

all you are doing is saying, regardless how clearly it is misogyny, so the fuck what. men will seabeyond Jul 2014 #68

Thank heavens broad-brushing isn't a 'girl thing'. polly7 Jul 2014 #70

You might get onto gman about it since he was the one to say it. But, thanks for seabeyond Jul 2014 #71

I didn't 'follow you' on anything. polly7 Jul 2014 #72

Very well said, polly. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #102

"I despise the way posters here are lumped into groups to be demonized " BainsBane Jul 2014 #142

You always forget the "in my opinion" part Gman Jul 2014 #75

So you admit you generalize about women treestar Jul 2014 #79

When they're really really really really pissed, at least in my experience. Much more pissed than Gman Jul 2014 #84

What's next? demosincebirth Jul 2014 #74

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #85

lol @ this thread LittleBlue Jul 2014 #90

It was over an intensely abusive PM BainsBane Jul 2014 #140

So did he get a piece of pizza or did he get the whole damn thing? Edit for never mind. :) I lonestarnot Jul 2014 #91

you state your case well fishwax Jul 2014 #99

Utter nonsense. Beausoir Jul 2014 #101

You and I disagree on a lot of things, cali MohRokTah Jul 2014 #103

pssst... hey cali.... shhh... WillyT Jul 2014 #128

I have never used that phrase before. dilby Jul 2014 #129

The idea that there is something "weak" about recognizing sexism is absurd BainsBane Jul 2014 #130

Who is "AAO", and what did they send? TorchTheWitch Jul 2014 #262

Here BainsBane Jul 2014 #263

glad the troll was banned; however, I agree with others who disagree with your framing ecstatic Jul 2014 #133

+1 kickysnana Jul 2014 #137

I agree with the OP get the red out Jul 2014 #135

Respectively disagree. kickysnana Jul 2014 #136

It may easily underestimate hell quaker bill Jul 2014 #138

I think this is one of those old world phrases that is not going away as fast as some others liberal N proud Jul 2014 #152

absolutely. it is merely the progression beyond the racism, sexism adn homophobia. and no, they seabeyond Jul 2014 #153

You haven't made your case. This reads more like an after-the-fact rationalization. nt Romulox Jul 2014 #155

... LordGlenconner Jul 2014 #160

... LordGlenconner Jul 2014 #161

Hilarious! :D kysrsoze Jul 2014 #205

I would bet the vast majority of people, DU or not, view that phrase as a compliment to women. ieoeja Jul 2014 #162

The person who sent it to the jury should be suspended. JEFF9K Jul 2014 #163

I personally don't see it that way LaurenG Jul 2014 #169

Calling our a sexist saying is not "crucifying" people. redqueen Jul 2014 #173

I don't understand what you said in your title. LaurenG Jul 2014 #174

There's a typo. "nor" should have been "not" redqueen Jul 2014 #176

Let it be known that I am the most anti bullying proponent LaurenG Jul 2014 #180

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #178

False balance. redqueen Jul 2014 #182

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #183

Nice dodge. nt redqueen Jul 2014 #189

some people actually raise an issue to be thought about and discussed. you go right into insult. seabeyond Jul 2014 #192

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #198

my personal issues are not in play unless you plan on creating that. wtf? so, you are saying seabeyond Jul 2014 #200

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #202

that is all i have read from you. you are the one advocating and doing. so, ok. ya... whatever. seabeyond Jul 2014 #203

It seems to me there is more degrading from those who don't think it's sexist kcr Jul 2014 #211

I agree with your comments about misogyny on DU. LWolf Jul 2014 #171

but see. thinking about it was all this was about. the insutls and accusations, simply seabeyond Jul 2014 #191

Well, I'm doing that, aren't I? LWolf Jul 2014 #195

yes. and it was an interesting read how you processed thought on the subject. seabeyond Jul 2014 #196

I wish others would put thought behind things as you have done here. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #248

Of course it's sexist. Orsino Jul 2014 #184

i was thinking about htis. a man murdering his wife, cause he is scorned. how would that play.... seabeyond Jul 2014 #194

If a Woman tells me, a man, something is sexist or misogynist, then that is that...they know. randys1 Jul 2014 #201

And . . . if another woman tells you, a man, the SAME something is NOT sexist . . . Petrushka Jul 2014 #206

Easy. You go with the person saying something is sexist/racist kcr Jul 2014 #264

So you agree than women are more prone than men to react with irrational rage when scorned? Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #302

A sound policy! smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #273

Is smirky from the HBO show with O'Dowd? randys1 Jul 2014 #300

No, it's an old reference smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #320

Every single day... more [insert irreparable harm]-ist B.S. kysrsoze Jul 2014 #204

Unforuntately, some who share the view BainsBane Jul 2014 #304

On political correctness BainsBane Jul 2014 #306

Puhleeeze, let's not get all hysterical now, woman. Zorra Jul 2014 #210

You know, I think this a millennial problem - we are supposed to throw out each and every word or Hestia Jul 2014 #218

As a woman, I loathe the idea that sexism/misogyny is the ONLY form of bigotry that we should ignore redqueen Jul 2014 #223

Educated people get what the phrase means treestar Jul 2014 #227

Like these uses, you mean? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #237

I don't think they are quite getting what "scorned" means treestar Jul 2014 #279

They're using it in exactly the same context that AAO used it in, that cali and you complained about muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #281

I hold this same opinion LaurenG Jul 2014 #234

You think anyone who disagrees with you doesn't think for themselves? redqueen Jul 2014 #243

It was sarcasm LaurenG Jul 2014 #244

gotcha... redqueen Jul 2014 #247

Great! LaurenG Jul 2014 #250

firstly, if i am "scorned" i walk. fury does not even have a place. so no. i wont own it. seabeyond Jul 2014 #249

An interesting thread that was posted today related to the word "Fury" awake Jul 2014 #233

Thank you for the link. Petrushka Jul 2014 #276

Thanks cali. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #239

You may find this interesting, or not. Sissyk Jul 2014 #253

There are couple of ex-boyfriends who can attest RebelOne Jul 2014 #261

"...spawn of the devil." ?? Oh, my! Petrushka Jul 2014 #265

meh Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #277

Perhaps "Hell hath no fury like a LOVER scorned?" IdaBriggs Jul 2014 #282

as someone in the midst of a divorce i did not even want mopinko Jul 2014 #284

If you are up in arms about misogyny why don't you attack the bible? mr blur Jul 2014 #305

golly gee. feminists talk about the bible? religion? geeez, why didnt feminists EVER seabeyond Jul 2014 #312