Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Core Truths: 10 Common GMO Claims Debunked [View all]Orrex
(67,111 posts)68. Demonstrate that the benefit outweighs the cost, and companies will volunteer
Foods produced using genetic engineering techniques as defined by genetic engineers.
Are you talking about the overwhelming population of genetic engineers who recognize GMOs as safe, or the handful of fringe outliers who insist that GMOs are dangerous despite a lack of evidence?
Does every organic product on the shelf have a label that says "grown with cow shit?" Why shouldn't this be stamped on every organic product? What's the harm in transparency?
GM's faulty ignition switches aren't hidden in their products, as GMO's are.
Really? Are all of GM's switches faulty? No? Are the faulty ones clearly identified as faulty? No? Then they're hidden. And yet they were identified. Amazing!
To date, no health problem has been demonstrably linked to GMOs, despite decades of luddite fear-mongering. You are proposing that GMOs be emblazoned with a scarlet letter for no real reason beyond the aesthetics of the consumer.
When there is a problem with contaminated beef, for example, people know if they have eaten beef.
But when such a problem occurs, we don't get a general "beware of beef" warning. Instead, we are advised of the specific products and distributors that are at issue, and products are recalled accordingly. If there should suddenly be an as yet entirely non-demonstrated problem with GMO soy, then we would receive a warning about the products that contain this soy.
In the absence of any evidence of harm from GMOs, I still don't see why companies should be required to tag their products in a way that might foster undue paranoia. Why not also make them reveal that one of their drivers was once arrested for vandalism and an accounting supervisor is undergoing chemo? Statistically, these factors pose about as much of a health risk as GMOs, so why not force them to disclose it?
For that matter, why not simply encourage non-GMO products to advertise as such? That would accomplish the same thing and could actually be used as a selling point among consumers who've only read the fear-mongering.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
263 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It seems to me that Conservatives don't trust science, liberals don't trust technology. nt
el_bryanto
Jul 2014
#5
So accusing those, mostly Liberals who tend to be more informed about these things,
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#28
No, I'm saying that the 770 studies -- I'll have to take your word on the number, since it's not
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#38
+1 I am having a hard time understanding the vehement stand against labeling.
Live and Learn
Jul 2014
#29
Oh great so you get to define your competitors products and exclude your own
MattBaggins
Jul 2014
#47
It is fair enough as a textbook collection of modern ways to change the genotype of an organism
MattBaggins
Jul 2014
#150
So, when confronted with the real defnition, you continue to attempt to redefine
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#156
I reject your attempt at redefinition as nothing more than attempt to cloud the discussion
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#164
My definition of GMO is the standard one. You're trying to stretch it to include
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#57
Mine is the definition in any dictionary or scientific reference. You should try looking it up.
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#157
My immediate and extended family is full of of completely sane scientists and engineers
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#199
You certainly appear to be moving the goalposts both quickly and deftly with each response you recei
LanternWaste
Jul 2014
#51
Nearly every processed food in most grocery stores would have to bear the label
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#60
That's true. But most of the public would quickly get over it because the alternative
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#65
Will the "I don't understand genetics" crowd start ripping the insulin out of my hand?
MattBaggins
Jul 2014
#107
Why would they have to rip it out of your hands to put a label on it?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Jul 2014
#128
Most of the time, I've noticed that patients don't read much of the labels.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Jul 2014
#136
Organic has a LEGAL definition thanks to misinformation and lobbying by the "health food" industry.
Dr Hobbitstein
Jul 2014
#172
Organic has a chemical definition, too. Benzene, asphalt, plastic and a host of other chemicals are
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#173
Forget it. Companies rarely think that protecting human lives is worth the cost.
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#93
rBGH is a genetically engineered hormone that was given to cows to increase their milk.
pnwmom
Jul 2014
#221
So now you are attempting to change the definition of genetic modification to include
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#71
IF GMO was such a wonderful product, the sweet corn growers would not have rejected it.
MohRokTah
Jul 2014
#54
What a hilariously predictable OP, and right on time, right after something was
djean111
Jul 2014
#78
I know that is what they are trying to do, but my self-esteem is quite intact!
djean111
Jul 2014
#94
You are equating your quaint science denialism with decades of society-wide persecution
Orrex
Jul 2014
#139
Label all foods clearly as containing GMO or not. Let me decide what to feed my family.
peacebird
Jul 2014
#155
Not my 'convenience', as a consumer I should have a right to know what is in my food.
peacebird
Jul 2014
#177
everything you eat is genetically modified unless you're eating a very strict, wild diet....
mike_c
Jul 2014
#222
Labeling the technology that led to the food gives you no information of value.
HuckleB
Jul 2014
#252