Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(93,774 posts)
13. Lee eventually signed the loyalty oath - The Confederacy was repudiated by their defeat.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 10:37 PM
Jul 2014

On May 29, 1865, President Andrew Johnson issued a Proclamation of Amnesty and Pardon to persons who had participated in the rebellion against the United States. There were fourteen excepted classes, though, and members of those classes had to make special application to the President.

Lee sent an application to Grant and wrote to President Johnson on June 13, 1865:

Being excluded from the provisions of amnesty & pardon contained in the proclamation of the 29th Ulto; I hereby apply for the benefits, & full restoration of all rights & privileges extended to those included in its terms. I graduated at the Mil. Academy at West Point in June 1829. Resigned from the U.S. Army April '61. Was a General in the Confederate Army, & included in the surrender of the Army of N. Va. 9 April '65.

Lee signed his Amnesty Oath on October 2, 1865, but was not restored to full citizenship in his lifetime.

On October 2, 1865, the same day that Lee was inaugurated as president of Washington College in Lexington, Virginia, he signed his Amnesty Oath, thereby complying fully with the provision of Johnson's proclamation. But Lee was not pardoned, nor was his citizenship restored. And the fact that he had submitted an amnesty oath at all was soon lost to history.

More than a hundred years later, in 1970, an archivist at the National Archives discovered Lee's Amnesty Oath among State Department records (reported in Prologue, Winter 1970). Apparently Secretary of State William H. Seward had given Lee's application to a friend as a souvenir, and the State Department had pigeonholed the oath.


http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2005/spring/piece-lee.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Long over due maindawg Jul 2014 #1
Sadly, it is RainDog Jul 2014 #2
If your state seceded from the Union NobodyHere Jul 2014 #12
The U.S. and for the answer to your other question: in a heartbeat. nt conservaphobe Jul 2014 #17
Great idea. Force them to defend the Confederacy. grahamhgreen Jul 2014 #3
I really like this idea on a moral level - not sure on a practical level el_bryanto Jul 2014 #4
The overwhelming majority of Democrats were anti-Confederacy RainDog Jul 2014 #5
texas has a confererate memorial on the grounds of the capital rdking647 Jul 2014 #6
what gets me RainDog Jul 2014 #9
Better idea - a resolution repudiating the multiple violations of treaties with Native Americans. Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #7
I think both would be useful RainDog Jul 2014 #8
Attempting to make 2014 Republicans take sides on a 150 year old war accomplishes exactly nothing Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #10
Thanks for sharing your opinion RainDog Jul 2014 #11
...and thanks for sharing yours Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #14
I go for that RainDog Jul 2014 #15
Lee eventually signed the loyalty oath - The Confederacy was repudiated by their defeat. bigtree Jul 2014 #13
I'm glad they're working on some relavent shit NightWatcher Jul 2014 #16
You miss the point RainDog Jul 2014 #18
How about a resolution to repudiate the 25% of people who think the sun revolves around the Earth? Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #19
If that's what you want RainDog Jul 2014 #20
I think a resolution acknowledging evolution is fact, tho, would be good RainDog Jul 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pelosi and Reid: Call for...»Reply #13