Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reorg

(3,317 posts)
11. about your vocabulary
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 06:50 PM
Jul 2014

Here is a short video from a rally of the "terrorists" in Donetsk:



so you can take a look before drones are sent in to destroy them.

While prattling on about the acumen of "internet sleuths", you cite three official Russian sources. I hate to break it to you, but had I posted these articles in LBN they'd have been deleted immediately due to their origin, deemed unreliable on this here internet sleuth territory.

Then you proceed to post some YouTube videos and Twitter messages that don't appear to prove anything, and conclude with something that was posted by the Kyiv Post and may or may not be authentic.

So, if we take your apparent conclusion, that militants of the "Donetsk People's Republic" may have made an error and caused this horrible accident when they attempted to shoot down a military supply plane - what does this prove, what exactly did the sleuths get nailed?

What should have been known all along, and for this you didn't need Internet sleuths, Russian news agencies or even CNN: that fighting was going on in this area, that planes had already been shot down and that it was highly irresponsible for airlines not divert their planes in order to protect their passengers and crews. I don't get this. They flew in a straight line right over a war area:


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #1
Do you think it's better than their Boston Marathon Bomber investigation? GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #2
Yeah, that was terrible... ReverendDeuce Jul 2014 #3
it's not that simple, people on the internet don't have to worry about credibility, news orgs most JI7 Jul 2014 #4
I get it, my aim was more at those who ALWAYS roll their eyes about Internet sleuthing... n/t ReverendDeuce Jul 2014 #6
Bwahahahah. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #7
that's why i said "should" JI7 Jul 2014 #9
News orgs worried about credibility? Capt. Obvious Jul 2014 #37
big time kick and rec GusBob Jul 2014 #5
K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2014 #8
Internet sleuthing rocks. littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #10
about your vocabulary reorg Jul 2014 #11
I have a feeling that someone is mad they didn't post it first... ReverendDeuce Jul 2014 #17
huh? n/t reorg Jul 2014 #24
'Hours'? No. muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #12
CNN was still refusing to say "shot down" until early afternoon... ReverendDeuce Jul 2014 #16
You appear to be confusing CNN with 'anyone other than internet "sleuths"' muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #19
Thanks. And CNN definitely was reporting a lot of this stuff very early on. pinboy3niner Jul 2014 #29
I'll just add this link to the Google Cache of that Strelkov Tweet countryjake Jul 2014 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jul 2014 #14
It was interesting to watch how everything happened online. Agschmid Jul 2014 #15
If you remember, social media was also spreading many false rumours as facts, for Boston muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #22
Absolutely, the Nova episode addresses that... Agschmid Jul 2014 #23
WOW! It's all over LBN and national media! Thanks for showing us the background! freshwest Jul 2014 #18
I have been impressed by Erin Burnett tonight... ReverendDeuce Jul 2014 #21
Where's Sarah Palin on this? We already heard from Bomb, bomb, bomb McCain. This is so horrible... freshwest Jul 2014 #30
DU rec... SidDithers Jul 2014 #20
Help me out here. When the Russians reported that the Ukrainians shot the rhett o rick Jul 2014 #25
The separatists claimed to shoot down a Ukrainian cargo plane today at that location muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #26
I dont have a bias in this fight but when a Russian source said that Ukrainians shot down a plane rhett o rick Jul 2014 #27
there is more evidence on one side than the other JI7 Jul 2014 #32
Claims about your own side are more credible than ones about your opponents muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #33
My point is that it seems that some here believe Russian news sources when it suits them and try rhett o rick Jul 2014 #36
You use the same sloppy tactics. People take issue with Russia Today in specific, you rephrase that Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #39
Some would argue that Tass News Agency is Russian propaganda. rhett o rick Jul 2014 #42
But no one would argue that RT is just a mouthpiece for Putin. zappaman Jul 2014 #43
"But no one would argue that RT is just a mouthpiece for Putin." Really? No one?? rhett o rick Jul 2014 #44
Do you disagree? zappaman Jul 2014 #45
The very fact that you think you speak for the "reality based community" proves you know rhett o rick Jul 2014 #46
Bwhahaha. zappaman Jul 2014 #47
Help me out here zappaman Jul 2014 #28
LOL. You can't be series. Why was it alerted on? Why was it more conspiratorial than rhett o rick Jul 2014 #31
There is no conspiracy. This is what happened! ReverendDeuce Jul 2014 #34
It's never a conspiracy when it favors your world view. rhett o rick Jul 2014 #35
Help me out here too.... Bobbie Jo Jul 2014 #40
At least GD hosting will be somewhat improved in the next few days! zappaman Jul 2014 #41
Lol - CNN speculates like web users, everyone gets mad, CNN waits to confirm, everyone is still mad cbdo2007 Jul 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Internet sleuths nailed M...»Reply #11