Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Run, Elizabeth, Run! - Slate [View all]
Run, Elizabeth, Run!Why an Elizabeth Warren presidential bid would be good for all Americans.
By John Dickerson - Slate
7/17/14
<snip>
Imagine there were a political movement that was against pablum in the public square, that promoted tough debates on pressing issues, that was suspicious of coronations, and cared about a presidential candidates qualities as much as the ideas she would bring to office? This proud movement would engage all the right-thinking members of the citizenry, liberal and conservative. It would enliven the daily discourse and it would push Sen. Elizabeth Warren to run for president.
At the moment, the Democratic contest looks like it will be a foggy, repetitive march toward Hillary Clinton. It will have all the safety, risk aversion, and lack of impact of Clintons recent book, Hard Choices.
The latest polling from NBC and Marist shows just how dominant Clinton appears. She beats Vice President Biden among Democratic voters in Iowa 70 percent to 20 percent and in New Hampshire 74 percent to 18 percent. Eighty-nine percent of Iowa Democrats view Clinton positively. In New Hampshire, she is more popular than flannel: Ninety-four percent view her warmly, which may set some kind of record for humankind.
If Warren joined the race, she would not win, but she would till the ground, putting grit and the smell of earth in the contest. She would energize the Democratic Partys liberal base, which would then stir up other Democrats who seek to moderate or contain that group. Warren would challenge the Democratic Party on issues like corporate power, income inequality, and entitlements. She would be a long shot and she would have nothing to losewhich means she could keep talking about those ideas out loud. Because Clinton is close to Wall Street and finance executives and Warren is gunning for them, she has the potential to put campaign pressure on Clinton that other candidates cant. Clinton and other candidates would be forced to explain where they stood more than if Warren werent in the race.
Whether you agree with Warrens ideas or whether she would even make a good president is immaterial to the benefits of her candidacy. She would keep the campaign lively and focused on ideas...
<snip>
More: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/07/elizabeth_warren_should_run_for_president_it_would_be_good_for_hillary_clinton.html
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was he telling people he definitely wasn't running and that he supported Hillary Clinton?
MoonRiver
Jul 2014
#6
Um... You Realize I Didn't Write The Piece, Right ??? - Just Posted It Here For Discussion...
WillyT
Jul 2014
#8
I think independents and some on the right who ALSO don't like banksters getting away with murder...
cascadiance
Jul 2014
#17