Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oops-Maryland man killed while testing bulletproof vest [View all]The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)43. Not Really A Straight Answer, Sir
Any fight, even the most ordinary, can get out of hand. But your answer was plain enough; you consider possession of a gun greatly adds to your chances of prevailing in a fight, since you would, in situations you deem most important, prefer to have a gun in your hand. So your opening gambit, the 'People kill people. They don't need a gun to do it' line, is tactics, not true position. It is not something you really mean seriously, rather it is something you say in the belief it might gain you some advantage, and lays groundwork for a claim that even restricting gun purchases or ownership would not really have any impact, because 'people don't need a gun to kill'. But you are quite aware possessing a gun makes it a good deal easier to kill.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Probably plead down to manslaughter. Either way he's facing some pretty heavy time. n/t
nomorenomore08
Jul 2014
#4
Whenever you 'test' something you really need to prepare for the possibility of a failure. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jul 2014
#29