Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some Defend-President-Obama-no-matter-what-folks here will do anything to divert, [View all]Hekate
(100,131 posts)65. Your center paragraph is literally the heart of the matter
I can understand feeling disappointed. I would suggest, however, that the corrective to that is not to look for another presidential candidate who tells you what you want to hear, but to focus on how we can bring about change. if you are talking about modest reforms of the sort a congress and President would actually enact, then the key is not the presidency but congress. That power is allocated largely during midterm elections like the cycle we are currently in. That is also when state legislatures, which control redistricting, tend to be determined and when the fewest Democrats turn out to vote. And endless focus on fantasy presidential elections doesn't help that situation. Elizabeth Warren isn't going to create a Democratic majority in your state or give you Democratic House and Senate members who can actually vote for the kind of legislation you might like to see enacted.
Incidentally, IF Senator Warren takes the bait and somehow wins, and if she should ever personally read DU in the aftermath, I pity her to the bottom of my heart. The perpetually disappointed and outraged are building unattainable fantasy-castles around her, and the aftermath will be ugly.
Incidentally, IF Senator Warren takes the bait and somehow wins, and if she should ever personally read DU in the aftermath, I pity her to the bottom of my heart. The perpetually disappointed and outraged are building unattainable fantasy-castles around her, and the aftermath will be ugly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some Defend-President-Obama-no-matter-what-folks here will do anything to divert, [View all]
cali
Jul 2014
OP
I have supported him, Hekate. I support him on Russia. I don't think his options are
cali
Jul 2014
#8
Is my recitation of criticisms required? I don't sing hosannas in his name, but ...
Hekate
Jul 2014
#22
I wouldn't mind being called a "sir" or "ma'am" but I do object to being called
betsuni
Jul 2014
#43
The president is of no consequence whatsoever beyond what he is able to achieve for the populace.
sibelian
Jul 2014
#34
the site was started because of the 2000 election being taken away from the establishment Dem Gore
JI7
Jul 2014
#132
"The function of the state is to serve capital" I think that statement needs modifying.
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#45
It's not a "fantasy world"....You are preaching total submission and surrender
Armstead
Jul 2014
#158
I myself am an "authoritarian," or so I've been told. My friends would be so surprised.
Hekate
Jul 2014
#71
Yes indeed. The obstructive, do-nothing Congress we have is a fine example of
Skidmore
Jul 2014
#150
I reject the point outright that the purpose of our government is to serve capital
BrotherIvan
Jul 2014
#72
Your entire premise is false, and the fact that you present it as accepted truth points to
Maedhros
Jul 2014
#108
Oh, baby! "I'm a Progressive - I believe that we must change for the better."
Enthusiast
Jul 2014
#141
This makes for very interesting reading. Thanks for giving me different words to think about it.
Hekate
Jul 2014
#139
This thread has turned into an interesting discussion, but I'll have to return tomorrow...
Hekate
Jul 2014
#25
The 1 Percent's economic interests do NOT equal the nation's economic interests.
Divernan
Jul 2014
#35
I completely agree. He has posted one corporate shill after another to head critical
NC_Nurse
Jul 2014
#23
In my humble opinion, there are two distinct types that behave as you've described ....
Scuba
Jul 2014
#28
Its pervasive now. It is a hallmark of systems that turn authoritarian.
woo me with science
Jul 2014
#50
There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. Lord Acton
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#66
I like Obama except for one thing: he's trying to change the Wilberforce Law in order to
Louisiana1976
Jul 2014
#78
I think we do have two small groups; one worships the man and the other group despises him.
Rex
Jul 2014
#95
You can critisize President Obama all you want, but you are wasting your valuable time.....
DrewFlorida
Jul 2014
#130
"there is a reflexive resistance to ANY criticisms or suggestions for change"
NCTraveler
Jul 2014
#168