Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 300 to 1 is disproportionate warfare [View all]Yogi362
(38 posts)169. The Palestinian people
Have legitimate demands that need to be met. Until then, they have the right to defend themselves. Only Israel has a moral and legal duty to unilaterally cease its aggression.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
218 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So Israel needs to let more of their civilians die before they are allowed to defend them?
Kurska
Jul 2014
#1
Are you advocating that US pay the entire bill for Iron dome? Because currently they don't
Kurska
Jul 2014
#13
Human shield tripe again? 300 dead, terrible shields, do not purchase any, and do not let shields
Fred Sanders
Jul 2014
#120
sure you would. Peace? Occupations don't come with peace. Stealing land generally upsets
cali
Jul 2014
#26
Gaza isn't stolen land, it was returned and Israel got nothing but rocket fire and tunnels.
Kurska
Jul 2014
#28
returned with no real autonomy. no airport. no seaport. no fishing. no exporting products made
cali
Jul 2014
#37
Israel withdrew in 2005 and the blockade started in 2007 after the takeover by hamas.
Kurska
Jul 2014
#43
Than apparently you condemn IDF for unnecessarily killing civilians. Glad we agree on this.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#30
They are taking actions which they know will result in hundreds of civilian deaths.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#47
I don't know which rule book you're using that prescribes a ratio that is 'proportionate'.
Flatulo
Jul 2014
#199
So, again, the answer is that no number of Palestinian civilian deaths is too many.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#22
Yes, Hamas should stop committing acts of terrorism and killing Israeli civilians.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#34
Israel should stop using their unbridled power and weapons to close borders and blockade
kelliekat44
Jul 2014
#50
"not that this justifies...." Except that is exactly what you are attempting to do, with "context."
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#111
I think you are confusing "punishment" with "retaliation." Perhaps the US ought not have gone to war
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#110
My "wow" was mostly in response to your (seeming) belief that breaking another preteen kid's arm
deurbano
Jul 2014
#193
It seems that since Israel's defense system works, they should just let them fire away.
7962
Jul 2014
#90
Seeing as you weren't there either, I guess your opinion fits right in that bucket. nt
laundry_queen
Jul 2014
#154
We saw the beginning of that mistake with korea. You never "win" unless you crush them
7962
Jul 2014
#159
Iron-dome is not a subsitute for stopping the rocket fire as I've already explained
Kurska
Jul 2014
#8
uh, you threatened me FIRST with the "that was a big mistake" line. memory problems?
cali
Jul 2014
#23
gee. I wonder why I thought it could be. Possibly all the false charges you've leveled at me.
cali
Jul 2014
#73
How many Palestinian civilians does IDF have to kill before it becomes disproportionate.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#14
Three million is a little excessive considering there are only 1.8 million living in Gaza.
TiredOfNo
Jul 2014
#126
Collective punishment against civilians is a war crime regardless of who they voted for.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#172
"Accept 1967 borders"?! Let's review some actual history--like, those pesky FACTS:
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#44
Except that Arafat did recognize Israel. And the right to exist had to do with land, not people. n
kelliekat44
Jul 2014
#54
So one can conclude that Hamas has rockets because Israel wants them to have rockets?
notadmblnd
Jul 2014
#80
Exactly. Except precision removal of the criminals would not further the ulterior goal
GoneFishin
Jul 2014
#66
no. that is not historically accurate. the settlements are illegal and have been deemed
cali
Jul 2014
#76
EXACTLY. If I hit you over the head with a bag of marbles, and you scoop them up, I don't get to
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#119
So? Like the U.N. always condemns Israel's RESPONSES but never the original atrocity?
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#115
The Israeli occupation of the West Bank and seige of Gaza IS the original atrocity.
Comrade Grumpy
Jul 2014
#149
Everyone has a different definition of "legitimately won" territory when it comes to I/P.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#82
Israel could stop the 300 to 1 killing by.....stopping the killing in the occupied lands/prison.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2014
#78
And IDF could have prevented the response by, you know, not going on a killing rampage.
DanTex
Jul 2014
#81
too late now - they should have thought of that before they starting raining down missiles
Baclava
Jul 2014
#93
I dispute your term "reckless." Israel issues many warnings to Hamas to remove their weaponry from
WinkyDink
Jul 2014
#108
I wouldn't disagree with that, but it doesn't absolve the Israeli's "mow the grass" tactic
cali
Jul 2014
#122
And, it's ever so nice of the Israelis to commit atrocities to give Hamas good PR.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#124
Does the U.N. hold an emergency meeting when the U.S. commits war crimes, like killing
cali
Jul 2014
#158
"States" exist only so long as they can defend territory or come to accommodation
SoCalDem
Jul 2014
#195
Oh another who doesn't believe in the right of Israel to exist. Drive the Jews in to the sea or into
TheKentuckian
Jul 2014
#216