General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Now I am confused about DU (a different answer to cali's OP) [View all]Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)always have a split, with factions that believe in two different paths to lasting electoral victory. Group A, who believe that you simply need to elect as many people who call themselves Democrats as possible, and that once you hold majorities, these people will become more progressive in the legislation they produce, and Group B, who believe that if you elect more progressive people, more voters will be drawn to believe that their votes matter, and as a result more Dems will be elected. So either more Dems will lead to better Dems, or better Dems will lead to more Dems.
Obviously, if you want to start with 'better Dems', you get them to BE better Dems by criticizing their mistakes, and applauding their correct actions, and only voting in 'better Dems'. If you want 'more Dems', then criticism from the left only hurts the chances of getting 'more'.
So there's the fight. And it's going to go on as long as you're on any Dem site that doesn't censor one viewpoint or the other. DU seems to try to walk the tightrope a bit, in that in the timeframe after candidates are selected in the primaries but before the election, criticism is prohibited, but you're still going to see the 'more Dems' folks complaining about criticism at any time in the election cycle.