Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some Defend-President-Obama-no-matter-what-folks here will do anything to divert, [View all]BainsBane
(57,306 posts)144. Liberalism
Classical liberalism is the ideology you refer to.
Edit: I though libertarianism was a more recent notion. It turns out it dates back to just after the American Revolution:
The term libertarian was first used by late-Enlightenment free-thinkers to refer to the metaphysical belief in free will, as opposed to determinism.[11] The first recorded use was in 1789, when William Belsham wrote about libertarianism in opposition to "necessitarian", i.e. determinist, views.[12][13]
Libertarian came to mean an advocate or defender of liberty, especially in the political and social spheres, as early as 1796, when the London Packet printed on 12 February: "Lately marched out of the Prison at Bristol, 450 of the French Libertarians."[14] The word was again used in a political sense in 1802, in a short piece critiquing a poem by "the author of Gebir", and has been used in this context since.[15][16][17]
The use of the word libertarian to describe a new set of political positions has been traced to the French cognate, libertaire, coined in a scathing letter French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque wrote to mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1857, castigating him for his sexist political views.[18][19] Déjacque also used the term for his anarchist publication Le Libertaire: Journal du Mouvement Social, which was printed from 9 June 1858 to 4 February 1861. In the mid-1890s, Sébastien Faure began publishing a new Le Libertaire while France's Third Republic enacted the lois scélérates ("villainous laws"
, which banned anarchist publications in France. Libertarianism has frequently been used as a synonym for anarchism since this time.[20][21][22]
Although the word libertarian continues to be widely used to refer to socialists internationally, its meaning in the United States has deviated from its political origins.[23][24] Libertarianism in the United States has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom[25] (for common meanings of conservative and liberal in the United States); it is also often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism.[26][27] Since the resurgence of neoliberalism in the 1970s, free-market capitalist libertarianism has spread beyond North America via think tanks and political parties.[28][29]
Libertarian came to mean an advocate or defender of liberty, especially in the political and social spheres, as early as 1796, when the London Packet printed on 12 February: "Lately marched out of the Prison at Bristol, 450 of the French Libertarians."[14] The word was again used in a political sense in 1802, in a short piece critiquing a poem by "the author of Gebir", and has been used in this context since.[15][16][17]
The use of the word libertarian to describe a new set of political positions has been traced to the French cognate, libertaire, coined in a scathing letter French libertarian communist Joseph Déjacque wrote to mutualist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1857, castigating him for his sexist political views.[18][19] Déjacque also used the term for his anarchist publication Le Libertaire: Journal du Mouvement Social, which was printed from 9 June 1858 to 4 February 1861. In the mid-1890s, Sébastien Faure began publishing a new Le Libertaire while France's Third Republic enacted the lois scélérates ("villainous laws"
Although the word libertarian continues to be widely used to refer to socialists internationally, its meaning in the United States has deviated from its political origins.[23][24] Libertarianism in the United States has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom[25] (for common meanings of conservative and liberal in the United States); it is also often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism.[26][27] Since the resurgence of neoliberalism in the 1970s, free-market capitalist libertarianism has spread beyond North America via think tanks and political parties.[28][29]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some Defend-President-Obama-no-matter-what-folks here will do anything to divert, [View all]
cali
Jul 2014
OP
I have supported him, Hekate. I support him on Russia. I don't think his options are
cali
Jul 2014
#8
Is my recitation of criticisms required? I don't sing hosannas in his name, but ...
Hekate
Jul 2014
#22
I wouldn't mind being called a "sir" or "ma'am" but I do object to being called
betsuni
Jul 2014
#43
The president is of no consequence whatsoever beyond what he is able to achieve for the populace.
sibelian
Jul 2014
#34
the site was started because of the 2000 election being taken away from the establishment Dem Gore
JI7
Jul 2014
#132
"The function of the state is to serve capital" I think that statement needs modifying.
KittyWampus
Jul 2014
#45
It's not a "fantasy world"....You are preaching total submission and surrender
Armstead
Jul 2014
#158
I myself am an "authoritarian," or so I've been told. My friends would be so surprised.
Hekate
Jul 2014
#71
Yes indeed. The obstructive, do-nothing Congress we have is a fine example of
Skidmore
Jul 2014
#150
I reject the point outright that the purpose of our government is to serve capital
BrotherIvan
Jul 2014
#72
Your entire premise is false, and the fact that you present it as accepted truth points to
Maedhros
Jul 2014
#108
Oh, baby! "I'm a Progressive - I believe that we must change for the better."
Enthusiast
Jul 2014
#141
This makes for very interesting reading. Thanks for giving me different words to think about it.
Hekate
Jul 2014
#139
This thread has turned into an interesting discussion, but I'll have to return tomorrow...
Hekate
Jul 2014
#25
The 1 Percent's economic interests do NOT equal the nation's economic interests.
Divernan
Jul 2014
#35
I completely agree. He has posted one corporate shill after another to head critical
NC_Nurse
Jul 2014
#23
In my humble opinion, there are two distinct types that behave as you've described ....
Scuba
Jul 2014
#28
Its pervasive now. It is a hallmark of systems that turn authoritarian.
woo me with science
Jul 2014
#50
There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. Lord Acton
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#66
I like Obama except for one thing: he's trying to change the Wilberforce Law in order to
Louisiana1976
Jul 2014
#78
I think we do have two small groups; one worships the man and the other group despises him.
Rex
Jul 2014
#95
You can critisize President Obama all you want, but you are wasting your valuable time.....
DrewFlorida
Jul 2014
#130
"there is a reflexive resistance to ANY criticisms or suggestions for change"
NCTraveler
Jul 2014
#168