Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
55. What does "back down" mean?
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 11:23 PM
Jul 2014

At least your proposal of resignation is something that can be delineated. But, he'd just wait a few years and come back again.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Like they should have done to the US in 2003? Autumn Jul 2014 #1
Russia has a security council seat and UN membership. How are you excluding them from that? Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #2
You stop all flyover rights for NATO member nations. eom MohRokTah Jul 2014 #4
what? Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #8
Putin could not get to the UN unless he can fly over Europe. eom MohRokTah Jul 2014 #11
There's almost certainly no way that's legal. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #9
You most certainly can. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #10
All flight plans must be approved by the country geek tragedy Jul 2014 #12
So we should violate our treaty obligations and push toward war Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #14
What treaty obligations? geek tragedy Jul 2014 #16
I believe it is a violation of UN convention to deny a member state access to the headquarters. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #18
They denied Yassir Arafat access. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #21
A. That we did it does not make it legal or ethical B. Russia is a permanent member of the UN. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #22
This is all speculation of course. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #23
Everything said on this board is, in essence, speculation. Yours just happens to be especially daft. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #24
I'm sure Evo Morales would agree that heads of state geek tragedy Jul 2014 #35
And I distinctly remember that being a particularly serious affair. But you seem confused... Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #38
The larger point being that if Putin is going to geek tragedy Jul 2014 #39
Say what? Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #26
There was a giant stink about it. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #34
In what special world do you exist that committing an illegal act justifies it? Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #40
The law on the US needing to allow whomever a foreign geek tragedy Jul 2014 #43
Comparing an Iranian diplomat to the President of Russia is so ridiculous it's obscene. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #44
Only because Iran is so marginalized and viewed as geek tragedy Jul 2014 #51
Well, no, because comparing a diplomat to a head of state is absurd. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #54
Your dishonesty in this discussion is on view. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #59
The old "liar liar pants on fire" rejoinder. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #60
Um, you said something untrue and then when called on it Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #61
either that, or you're just not able to follow the argument geek tragedy Jul 2014 #62
"They denied Yassir Arafat access." nt. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #63
they denied his visa request. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #64
Yassir Arafat did not represent a member state. former9thward Jul 2014 #32
That's not going to happen. morningfog Jul 2014 #53
Stop all landing rights at all airports in NATO member nations. eom MohRokTah Jul 2014 #3
I believe that is illegal. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #6
Nope, any nation can stop any landing rights in their territory. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #7
cuban aircraft fly to New York to transport UN diplomatic personnel. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #13
Right the only exception. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #15
No really they can't blocade diplomatic flights without breaking treaty obligations. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #17
As I've been reading, it appears countries negotiate treaties with other countries for air access. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #19
It's happened before. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #25
Except it would be a baseless threat and mean nothing. It would be difficult enough to enforce... Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #28
Which or What Behavior of Putin would you like to "modify?" KoKo Jul 2014 #29
His spport of separatists in Ukraine. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #37
Morons? You don't think these people have a cause that resonates with them? KoKo Jul 2014 #42
And, what would that accomplish? What do you want from Russia? KoKo Jul 2014 #47
I have yet to hear anyone offer a plan or an objective. morningfog Jul 2014 #57
That won't happen. morningfog Jul 2014 #56
Unless he ordered it shot down, I don't see him as responsible. arcane1 Jul 2014 #5
.. Malone Jul 2014 #48
Putin doesn't know shame. He responds to pressure by doubling down. randome Jul 2014 #20
Yep, sadly that's quite true. I've heard the Russian people like him, they see him as a RKP5637 Jul 2014 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author KoKo Jul 2014 #27
Putin RedFury Jul 2014 #31
I'm sorry, does invading and annexing part of a sovereign nation not count as imperialism to you? Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author KoKo Jul 2014 #46
He didn't invade Crimea...it's your "TP" thinking folks here don't read? KoKo Jul 2014 #49
Russian troops invaded Crimea before the referendums. And not everyone was happy about that. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #52
By invading his neighbor? You have an inverted geek tragedy Jul 2014 #36
So you say RedFury Jul 2014 #45
Bless your heart. nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #50
So you say. Cha Jul 2014 #58
What does "back down" mean? morningfog Jul 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Putin Should Be Ostricize...»Reply #55