General Discussion

reorg

(3,317 posts)

16. No, the point is that a thorough investigation is needed

Tue Jul 22, 2014, 08:31 AM

Jul 2014

before people like you herd everybody else into accepting the politically most convenient version, even if it isn't true.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, where is the proof that "rebels"/Russians shot down the plane? [View all] reorg Jul 2014 OP

the blur in the large pic conveniently covers up the vehicle # (312 in the first pic) nt msongs Jul 2014 #1

you think that's on purpose? reorg Jul 2014 #2

Russian government has already admitted there were Buks in rebel-controlled territory near the scene geek tragedy Jul 2014 #3

in case you are referring to the Defense Ministry briefing reorg Jul 2014 #4

they admitted the key fact, Their dishonest attempts to spin it are not relevant to anything geek tragedy Jul 2014 #5

so, you think that the pictures provided at the press conference reorg Jul 2014 #6

There was a Buk in rebel territory right geek tragedy Jul 2014 #9

says the Russians? reorg Jul 2014 #10

The Russians are validating what the Americans said. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #11

The Russian defense ministry collects radar data reorg Jul 2014 #13

The talking points from the Kremlin suggest geek tragedy Jul 2014 #14

"briefly", he said reorg Jul 2014 #15

I know more about telling the truth than the Russian geek tragedy Jul 2014 #19

that may well be true reorg Jul 2014 #21

No, the point is that a thorough investigation is needed reorg Jul 2014 #16

Too bad the primary suspects had days to tamper geek tragedy Jul 2014 #20

do you believe they removed the shrapnel holes reorg Jul 2014 #22

Yes, I believe they did remove anything resembling geek tragedy Jul 2014 #23

a pre-emptive rationalization in case no proof can be established? reorg Jul 2014 #24

Common sense. nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #26

well, "based on ... common sense" reorg Jul 2014 #27

every fact points towards Team Russia on this one. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #29

no, Russia has proof and actually hands it over to the investigation reorg Jul 2014 #31

Russia has proof that there were high-altitude missiles in rebel territory right geek tragedy Jul 2014 #32

the credibility of the Ukraine Security Service is a minor detail? reorg Jul 2014 #33

a single photo of a rocket launcher geek tragedy Jul 2014 #35

break what case? reorg Jul 2014 #36

what really matters is that the launcher was there when the plane geek tragedy Jul 2014 #37

I agree that the Ukrainians should stop playing games reorg Jul 2014 #38

I don't see anything claiming the "entering" pic is July. joshcryer Jul 2014 #7

there is no "entering" picture, they say they observed reorg Jul 2014 #8

OK, I see that. joshcryer Jul 2014 #12

What kind of missile would have had to be used? Puzzledtraveller Jul 2014 #17

According to everything that was said, not shoulder-fired missiles reorg Jul 2014 #18

I welcome all versions of what happened malaise Jul 2014 #25

Same here...in time truth will out...n/t KoKo Jul 2014 #39

... LordGlenconner Jul 2014 #28

Thanks for posting this. Let's hope a genuine investigation can move beyond Karmadillo Jul 2014 #30

Yup. Reccing not because I know what happened, woo me with science Jul 2014 #34

Kick Karmadillo Jul 2014 #40

just wanted to add that RT has finally picked up on these findings reorg Jul 2014 #41

So how are theses theories holding up! Separation Jul 2014 #42

What theories? reorg Jul 2014 #43

So, where is the proof that "rebels"/Russians shot down the plane? Separation Jul 2014 #44

Finally, I found it! reorg Jul 2014 #45