Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A light came on for me this morning, while watching ... [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)61. One is an index of the other, I think they'd say
The spiraling wealth *gap* is indicative that we are catering to the wealthy disproportionately. OWS was a response to the fact that the supposed geniuses on Wall Street claiming to have just created wealth through their own brilliance in fact foisted a species of "pump and dump" speculative fraud on the entire world.
The premise as I saw it is that neither the economic crash nor the accelerating wealth gap could occur without tilting the playing field grossly toward wealthy interests. For example, not just de-regulation and tax breaks, but also the implied protection of American taxpayers should anything go wrong. Or VERY wrong, as was the case. Privatized reward based on socialized risk, etc.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is just that might be considered Far left - I despise the Third Way and Corporatism - and it
djean111
Jul 2014
#5
I think that's a good characterization of the problem, and it denotes an acceptance
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Jul 2014
#3
The GOP is appalled that we have any sort of boat at all, and is trying to hand out a Titanic-sized
djean111
Jul 2014
#6
does she pay more taxes than rmoney?does she think her taxes should go UP!
pansypoo53219
Jul 2014
#17
Missed it? The point is, those who oppose Clinton do not oppose her because of her wealth.
Enthusiast
Jul 2014
#37
GOP 1% want to pay LOWER tax rate than 99% vs Dem 1% want to pay HIGHER rate than 99%....
ErikJ
Jul 2014
#30
Well said. That's exactly the issue. When someone's wealth depends on someone's
valerief
Jul 2014
#31
If you value job creation, you should be against free trade deals like the TPP.
Enthusiast
Jul 2014
#48
It's crystal clear, actually, and I posted elsewhere about how Clinton is making Mitt's mistake
Warpy
Jul 2014
#55
I have strong concerns about Hillary - but how much money she has is not one of them
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2014
#63