Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Derangement Syndrome about her Presidency begins 30 months early [View all]betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)14. That's nice n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Derangement Syndrome about her Presidency begins 30 months early [View all]
stevenleser
Jul 2014
OP
I thought people were ridiculous with Obama, attacking him just after his election for appointments
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#2
That's because they're full of themselves; I know some would rather lose to the GOP
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#80
It's a free country. You can do whatever silly stuff you want. And I will call you on it. nt
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#23
Let 'em go at it then. I have ZERO tolerance for the GOP. If they did burst a blood vessel
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#78
I have no clue who I will support in the Illinois primary 20 months from now...
greatauntoftriplets
Jul 2014
#4
Yes, they're deranged. Their already projecting foreign policy choices and imputing GOP support
stevenleser
Jul 2014
#8
There was opposition to the warrantless wiretapping, guess what it was changed in 2008, ordered
Thinkingabout
Jul 2014
#102
My, how nice to be able to just snap your fingers like that and make your words true!
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#150
Actually, you believe Warren would be weak and taken advantage of by the "neocon dominated DC...
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#15
but your concern is war with Iran. A good economic policy has little to do with that
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#22
So? The fact is you posted 'concern' about Iran and said Warren would be taken in by neocons
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#27
you're avoiding the question - PROVE Hillary believes banks should set economic policy
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#50
Making things up as you go. Now PROVE Hillary believes banks should set economic policy
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#57
Yeah, he DID. For breaking international law. Now prove Obama is seeking revenge on Putin
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#85
More conspiracy theorist arguments. You're really contending Assad didn't gas his people?
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#119
oh who knows? When you replied with something incoherent, the obvious conclusion was you were...
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#133
Advices the president on economic matters - which doesn't mean the banks run things
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#90
that's your opinion and it still doesn't prove the banks set US economic policy
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#99
Public opinion? Really? You have evidence the public believes banks set US economic policy?
wyldwolf
Jul 2014
#103
You're claiming that Durbin isn't an expert at how our government works?
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#114
You're seriously claiming that Durbin isn't an expert at how our government works.
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#118
So, you're seriously claiming that Sen. Durbin isn't an expert on how our government works.
MannyGoldstein
Jul 2014
#121
And you did feel the need to point out that Rand Paul would never pick a fight with Iran. Even in
Squinch
Jul 2014
#30
Gee Manny, if only you could spend a bunch of time rubbing elbows over at FOX news, you could
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#42
You got it all wrong, you get to use as many facts as you want, as long as you make them up
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#123
The Bieberette types always appeared deranged to me as well, but apparently hero worship is just
Dragonfli
Jul 2014
#44
Lefties like that are constantly stuffing the right's straw men with more straw. nt
conservaphobe
Jul 2014
#31
Yeah! How DARE she criticize a Dictator whose regime uses chemical weapons on its citizens...
brooklynite
Jul 2014
#95
He's not "buying in." He's pointing it out and if it works for him, fine with me. nt
MADem
Jul 2014
#101
the first one comes off as someone making fun of the things Catherina/Tiniore would post
JI7
Jul 2014
#87
Where's the "sexist" part? Hillary is a crappy, neolib, 3rd Way, candidate who voted for war.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#125
This thread represents a new low. It's just pathetic, and reflects much more poorly
Romulox
Jul 2014
#131
Oh, so now it is "Hillary's Presidency"? Bit of hubris there, or trying to influence expectations
djean111
Jul 2014
#151
Next hit will be Vince Foster, Monica and the blue dress... Oops, that one's being linked, too.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#158