Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
You would think she is the devil incarnate if you listened to some here. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #1
I thought people were ridiculous with Obama, attacking him just after his election for appointments stevenleser Jul 2014 #2
I proudly admit who I want to support Aerows Jul 2014 #6
I am not looking foward to next year. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #10
I'm afraid the 2016 primary is going to make the 2008 primary look tame. stevenleser Jul 2014 #19
Many of them are Republicans. nt DURHAM D Jul 2014 #65
That's because they're full of themselves; I know some would rather lose to the GOP IrishAyes Jul 2014 #80
Me either. greatauntoftriplets Jul 2014 #26
Yes a read a but of it at the time. This will not be fun. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #29
Oh you mean you can't attack them for stupid shit after the fact either betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #13
It's a free country. You can do whatever silly stuff you want. And I will call you on it. nt stevenleser Jul 2014 #23
If I were embarrassed about my preference for different candidates betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #37
Let 'em go at it then. I have ZERO tolerance for the GOP. If they did burst a blood vessel IrishAyes Jul 2014 #78
So we should just shut up and let them indulge in the same old crap Armstead Jul 2014 #140
I heard she kicks puppies for distance and accuracy... SidDithers Jul 2014 #3
I thought it was lighting kitten fur on fire but you might be right. stevenleser Jul 2014 #9
MSNBC just confirmed it... Agschmid Jul 2014 #154
I have no clue who I will support in the Illinois primary 20 months from now... greatauntoftriplets Jul 2014 #4
Nor do I Aerows Jul 2014 #5
Oh Jesus H Christ mindwalker_i Jul 2014 #7
Yes, they're deranged. Their already projecting foreign policy choices and imputing GOP support stevenleser Jul 2014 #8
You can project foreign policy choices based on a persons past betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #16
Please proceed, governor. LMAO. nt stevenleser Jul 2014 #21
The term ODS was used mindwalker_i Jul 2014 #28
There was opposition to the warrantless wiretapping, guess what it was changed in 2008, ordered Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #102
That's an orthogonal issue mindwalker_i Jul 2014 #113
Are you saying the warrantless wiretapping is continuing? Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #129
I only mentioned Snowden in reference to mindwalker_i Jul 2014 #137
Wiretapping is not the same as phone call records. Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #147
GOD status ...in process. L0oniX Jul 2014 #55
And so it begins.... IrishAyes Jul 2014 #84
This OP Is Lame? billhicks76 Jul 2014 #96
If you say so, master. IrishAyes Jul 2014 #105
I Just Did billhicks76 Jul 2014 #107
My, how nice to be able to just snap your fingers like that and make your words true! IrishAyes Jul 2014 #150
Truth billhicks76 Jul 2014 #153
She Might Win But... billhicks76 Jul 2014 #155
Where we disagree is the matter of distribution. IrishAyes Jul 2014 #156
I think that person has been here under another name. wyldwolf Jul 2014 #11
That's nice n/t betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #14
Where did anyone mention her gender? betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #12
Actually, you believe Warren would be weak and taken advantage of by the "neocon dominated DC... wyldwolf Jul 2014 #15
She would be a real improvement on economic policy though. betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #20
but your concern is war with Iran. A good economic policy has little to do with that wyldwolf Jul 2014 #22
The fact that I posted concern about Iran betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #24
So? The fact is you posted 'concern' about Iran and said Warren would be taken in by neocons wyldwolf Jul 2014 #27
I doubt we share much criteria betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #35
in other words, you don't want to compare them wyldwolf Jul 2014 #38
Neocons don't genreally have an economic policy betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #40
No? Tell that to these people: wyldwolf Jul 2014 #45
DLCers generally favor supply side economics too betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #47
you're avoiding the question - PROVE Hillary believes banks should set economic policy wyldwolf Jul 2014 #50
I would also point out that to the degree they were betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #53
Making things up as you go. Now PROVE Hillary believes banks should set economic policy wyldwolf Jul 2014 #57
Her husband allowed them to set econonomic betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #58
If so, so? Prove it and prove Hillary believes that.. and just remember... wyldwolf Jul 2014 #59
I revised the post with links. n/t betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #60
which in no way proves what you're asserting wyldwolf Jul 2014 #61
Well she is sympathetic to banks in ways that are generally betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #67
that's your opinion. Your link in no way says or implies that wyldwolf Jul 2014 #70
Isn't this the same talking point used against Obama in the 2008 election? blackspade Jul 2014 #62
What? That Obama would be seduced by Neocons? Don't recall that wyldwolf Jul 2014 #66
He has been seduced by neocons betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #69
How so? wyldwolf Jul 2014 #71
He appointed betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #76
That's nuts wyldwolf Jul 2014 #81
You mean Obama didn't call for regime change against Syria betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #82
Yeah, he DID. For breaking international law. Now prove Obama is seeking revenge on Putin wyldwolf Jul 2014 #85
There are many countries the break international law in many ways betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #92
which of our allies gassed their own people? wyldwolf Jul 2014 #94
More ADD arguments. betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #115
More conspiracy theorist arguments. You're really contending Assad didn't gas his people? wyldwolf Jul 2014 #119
Well that went over you head. blackspade Jul 2014 #124
not, it just didn't illicit the response you were expecting wyldwolf Jul 2014 #127
ANd what would that have been, Omniscient one? blackspade Jul 2014 #130
oh who knows? When you replied with something incoherent, the obvious conclusion was you were... wyldwolf Jul 2014 #133
And you would know incoherence.... blackspade Jul 2014 #134
for real! Especially after conversing with you. wyldwolf Jul 2014 #135
Bravo, you're so clever with your insults. blackspade Jul 2014 #136
The golden rule wyldwolf Jul 2014 #138
Says the engineer of the insult train. blackspade Jul 2014 #139
Say the owner of the railroad wyldwolf Jul 2014 #141
Fail. I'm too poor to own a railroad. blackspade Jul 2014 #142
I'm sorry you failed. No not really wyldwolf Jul 2014 #143
Oh, you can do better than that. blackspade Jul 2014 #144
Yes but why waste it on you? wyldwolf Jul 2014 #145
Now, that's better. blackspade Jul 2014 #146
Well Obama's real record hasn't been very good betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #68
So now Obama has let banks 'formulate economic policy?' wyldwolf Jul 2014 #73
So Geithner wasn't a banker? n/t betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #77
how does that prove Obama is letting banks "formulate economic policy?" wyldwolf Jul 2014 #83
What does the Secretary of the Treasury do? Clean parks? n/t betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #88
Advices the president on economic matters - which doesn't mean the banks run things wyldwolf Jul 2014 #90
I don't think he should have appointed all those goldman sachs people betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #97
that's your opinion and it still doesn't prove the banks set US economic policy wyldwolf Jul 2014 #99
This isn't a court of law betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #100
Public opinion? Really? You have evidence the public believes banks set US economic policy? wyldwolf Jul 2014 #103
Evidently it is working to get some politicians elected betterdemsonly Jul 2014 #106
Evidently? How so. wyldwolf Jul 2014 #108
LOL MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #109
LOL wyldwolf Jul 2014 #112
You're claiming that Durbin isn't an expert at how our government works? MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #114
I'm yielding to the definition of the 'appeal to authority' logical fallacy wyldwolf Jul 2014 #116
You're seriously claiming that Durbin isn't an expert at how our government works. MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #118
I'm yielding to the definition of the 'appeal to authority' logical fallacy wyldwolf Jul 2014 #120
So, you're seriously claiming that Sen. Durbin isn't an expert on how our government works. MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #121
I'm yielding to the definition of the 'appeal to authority' logical fallacy wyldwolf Jul 2014 #122
Less this, one suspects: Smarmie Doofus Jul 2014 #25
And you did feel the need to point out that Rand Paul would never pick a fight with Iran. Even in Squinch Jul 2014 #30
Actually, it's Senator Elizabeth Warren from the great State of Massachusetts. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #89
Off by about 120 months! whistler162 Jul 2014 #17
How the hell is that sexist? leftstreet Jul 2014 #18
If YOU don't understand why, then MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #32
DU will implode during the HillaryPrimary leftstreet Jul 2014 #34
And implode again when inevitability 2.0 fails. morningfog Jul 2014 #49
Gee Manny, if only you could spend a bunch of time rubbing elbows over at FOX news, you could Dragonfli Jul 2014 #42
It would be nice to be a member of the Smart Set MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #111
You got it all wrong, you get to use as many facts as you want, as long as you make them up Dragonfli Jul 2014 #123
It had to be sexist because racist didn't fit. Dragonfli Jul 2014 #33
this. KG Jul 2014 #36
+1 leftstreet Jul 2014 #39
The Bieberette types always appeared deranged to me as well, but apparently hero worship is just Dragonfli Jul 2014 #44
yep exactly. nt m-lekktor Jul 2014 #41
I was here in 2008 enigmatic Jul 2014 #46
Epic MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #110
Ayup LondonReign2 Jul 2014 #132
Lefties like that are constantly stuffing the right's straw men with more straw. nt conservaphobe Jul 2014 #31
right. Phlem Jul 2014 #54
Republicans could do a lot worse than Hillary RedstDem Jul 2014 #43
"Trying to stop her election" as if it is a forgone conclusion morningfog Jul 2014 #48
She is an absolutely terrible choice. DeSwiss Jul 2014 #51
And actually I don't think she can win in the general election. zeemike Jul 2014 #93
! DeSwiss Jul 2014 #104
Agreed. Plus... appal_jack Jul 2014 #149
Third Way approved puppet rehearsal. L0oniX Jul 2014 #52
spot on. Phlem Jul 2014 #56
no DonCoquixote Jul 2014 #63
How did she "try to start a war in Syria"? BainsBane Jul 2014 #64
here DonCoquixote Jul 2014 #74
Yeah! How DARE she criticize a Dictator whose regime uses chemical weapons on its citizens... brooklynite Jul 2014 #95
Neither would I want to be embraced by a bunch of snakes. IrishAyes Jul 2014 #72
I will certainly support Hillary.... the_sly_pig Jul 2014 #75
That whole article is a massive troll, and anyone who buys in is lost. MADem Jul 2014 #79
Clickbait journalism. joshcryer Jul 2014 #86
That's it, in one word! nt MADem Jul 2014 #91
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=204842 Phlem Jul 2014 #98
He's not "buying in." He's pointing it out and if it works for him, fine with me. nt MADem Jul 2014 #101
K. Phlem Jul 2014 #117
the first one comes off as someone making fun of the things Catherina/Tiniore would post JI7 Jul 2014 #87
Where's the "sexist" part? Hillary is a crappy, neolib, 3rd Way, candidate who voted for war. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #125
+1000 djean111 Jul 2014 #126
ok so now you accuses this OP to be mysigynist mylye2222 Jul 2014 #128
This thread represents a new low. It's just pathetic, and reflects much more poorly Romulox Jul 2014 #131
I don't have one left leaning friend IRL who dislikes Hillary. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #148
+1 freshwest Jul 2014 #157
Oh, so now it is "Hillary's Presidency"? Bit of hubris there, or trying to influence expectations djean111 Jul 2014 #151
Hillary isn't my kind of liberal Prophet 451 Jul 2014 #152
Next hit will be Vince Foster, Monica and the blue dress... Oops, that one's being linked, too. freshwest Jul 2014 #158
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Derangement Syndr...»Reply #14