Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Separation

(1,975 posts)
44. So, where is the proof that "rebels"/Russians shot down the plane?
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 08:39 PM
Jul 2014

I think it's been pretty much been established who shot it down now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the blur in the large pic conveniently covers up the vehicle # (312 in the first pic) nt msongs Jul 2014 #1
you think that's on purpose? reorg Jul 2014 #2
Russian government has already admitted there were Buks in rebel-controlled territory near the scene geek tragedy Jul 2014 #3
in case you are referring to the Defense Ministry briefing reorg Jul 2014 #4
they admitted the key fact, Their dishonest attempts to spin it are not relevant to anything geek tragedy Jul 2014 #5
so, you think that the pictures provided at the press conference reorg Jul 2014 #6
There was a Buk in rebel territory right geek tragedy Jul 2014 #9
says the Russians? reorg Jul 2014 #10
The Russians are validating what the Americans said. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #11
The Russian defense ministry collects radar data reorg Jul 2014 #13
The talking points from the Kremlin suggest geek tragedy Jul 2014 #14
"briefly", he said reorg Jul 2014 #15
I know more about telling the truth than the Russian geek tragedy Jul 2014 #19
that may well be true reorg Jul 2014 #21
No, the point is that a thorough investigation is needed reorg Jul 2014 #16
Too bad the primary suspects had days to tamper geek tragedy Jul 2014 #20
do you believe they removed the shrapnel holes reorg Jul 2014 #22
Yes, I believe they did remove anything resembling geek tragedy Jul 2014 #23
a pre-emptive rationalization in case no proof can be established? reorg Jul 2014 #24
Common sense. nt geek tragedy Jul 2014 #26
well, "based on ... common sense" reorg Jul 2014 #27
every fact points towards Team Russia on this one. geek tragedy Jul 2014 #29
no, Russia has proof and actually hands it over to the investigation reorg Jul 2014 #31
Russia has proof that there were high-altitude missiles in rebel territory right geek tragedy Jul 2014 #32
the credibility of the Ukraine Security Service is a minor detail? reorg Jul 2014 #33
a single photo of a rocket launcher geek tragedy Jul 2014 #35
break what case? reorg Jul 2014 #36
what really matters is that the launcher was there when the plane geek tragedy Jul 2014 #37
I agree that the Ukrainians should stop playing games reorg Jul 2014 #38
I don't see anything claiming the "entering" pic is July. joshcryer Jul 2014 #7
there is no "entering" picture, they say they observed reorg Jul 2014 #8
OK, I see that. joshcryer Jul 2014 #12
What kind of missile would have had to be used? Puzzledtraveller Jul 2014 #17
According to everything that was said, not shoulder-fired missiles reorg Jul 2014 #18
I welcome all versions of what happened malaise Jul 2014 #25
Same here...in time truth will out...n/t KoKo Jul 2014 #39
... LordGlenconner Jul 2014 #28
Thanks for posting this. Let's hope a genuine investigation can move beyond Karmadillo Jul 2014 #30
Yup. Reccing not because I know what happened, woo me with science Jul 2014 #34
Kick Karmadillo Jul 2014 #40
just wanted to add that RT has finally picked up on these findings reorg Jul 2014 #41
So how are theses theories holding up! Separation Jul 2014 #42
What theories? reorg Jul 2014 #43
So, where is the proof that "rebels"/Russians shot down the plane? Separation Jul 2014 #44
Finally, I found it! reorg Jul 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, where is the proof th...»Reply #44