Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

niyad

(132,468 posts)
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 10:29 PM Jul 2014

It’s Been 90 Years: Time to Pass the ERA (actually, 91 years) [View all]

. . . .

Equal Rights Amendment

Paul was the original author of a proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution in 1923.[7] The ERA was passed by both houses in Congress in 1972 and was then submitted to the state legislatures for ratification. Approval by 38 states was required to ensure adoption of the amendment. Not enough states—only 35—voted in favor in time for the deadline. However, efforts to pass the ERA are still happening, as well as efforts to pass a new equality amendment. Although the amendment hasn't passed yet, almost half of the U.S. states have adopted the ERA into their state constitutions.[13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Paul

It’s Been 90 Years: Time to Pass the ERA!



Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Jackie Speier (D-CA) gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court Thursday morning to demand that the Equal Rights Amendment finally pass.
The congresswomen, along with Feminist Majority president (and publisher of Ms.) Ellie Smeal, NOW president Terry O’Neill and other feminist leaders and activists, called on legislators to codify women’s equality in the constitution. As a reminder of the anti-woman rhetoric that has lately informed public policy, Rep. Speier quoted Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scalia, “Certainly the constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex, the only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn’t.”

She continued,

A justice of the Supreme Court has said publicly that the constitution does not prohibit discrimination based on sex, and that is precisely why we need the ERA. Those words should haunt every woman in this country.

The good news, she said, is that “equality is only 24 words away,” referencing the text of the ERA:
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

The congresswomen have each introduced ERA-related legislation. In March, Rep. Speier called on legislators to remove the deadline by which states must ratify the amendment (the last deadline was June 1982, and by that date the ERA was just three states shy of passing). If passed, her bill would give those last three states a chance to ratify the amendment.

In September 2013, Rep. Maloney re-introduced the ERA in Congress (it was first introduced by Alice Paul in 1923), asking legislators to pass the bill and send it to the states for ratification. Most feminists are supporting both strategies, because they ultimately lead to the same goal.
As Rep. Speier said Thursday, “The ERA is critically necessary because it would once and for all give women the remedies for justice when they face sex discrimination.”

Ninety years is long enough—it’s time to pass the ERA. To get involved, tweet your support with the hashtag #ERANow.

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2014/07/24/its-been-90-years-time-to-pass-the-era/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Absolutely agree! Small Accumulates Jul 2014 #1
A HUGE K & R femmocrat Jul 2014 #2
Yes! Kath1 Jul 2014 #3
KnR sheshe2 Jul 2014 #4
K&R! nt Mnemosyne Jul 2014 #5
In the wake of Hobby Lobby, this is absolutely time to re-introduce/rescind the time limit Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #6
Do you have a link to a legal analysis of the ERA and Hobby Lobby? Jim Lane Jul 2014 #8
The decision underscores the need for legal equality for women to be written into the Constitution. Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2014 #14
I have the decision. I meant a link about what effect the ERA would have. Jim Lane Jul 2014 #15
long overdue... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #7
K&R nt redqueen Jul 2014 #9
. . . niyad Jul 2014 #10
K&R demmiblue Jul 2014 #11
K&R! smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #12
. . . niyad Jul 2014 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It’s Been 90 Years: Time ...