Sheriff Smashes Car Window to Rescue Overheated Dogs

[Orrex]

61. Are you an attorney? If not, then you're making shit up.

If you can't cite for me the exact statute by which I could claim immunity for damaging property (the car) to access property (the animal), then you're making shit up.

I've read through several phrasings of the relevant statute, and I can find nothing that gives me the right to damage property to access an animal. Pennsylvania's law is rather more specific than you seem to want to pretend. Please cite for me the exact text that indemnifies me from liability for damaging property to access an animal.

If you can't provide that text, then please admit that you're making shit up.

It may be the case that "the penalty would not happen", and it may be the case that "it would not be that bad," but you have no basis for asserting this outside of your own wishful thinking. Your argument is based on what you hope would happen in the wake of civil and criminal action following my choice to damage someone's property.

You're living in a very dreary world.

And you are fortunate to be able to pretend that the world is the rosy place you imagine it to be.

Breaking property vs. saving a life - your sense of proportion there is way off.

Accessing a dog vs. the very real possibility of serious longterm hardship for my family and me? I'd say that my sense of proportion is right on target, thanks.