Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't know. This Trayvon thing seems to be CONSUMING America [View all]Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)70. Thank you for being so specific, it's appreciated.
If the SCOTUS would quit their judicial activism and wilful reinterpretation of the 2nd Amendment, to start, then Congress could pass laws to enforce the 'well-regulated' part.
Not about to happen with a Republican majority in the House and more than 40 Republicans in the Senate.
* Repeal Stand Your Ground laws (obvious one)
Disagree.
* Repeal Concealed Carry laws (no individual right to carry)
Disagree.
* Ban assault weapons, including for hunting (no right to bear an F-16 or nuke... reasonable limits on what can be sold)
Disagree with banning the most popular centerfire rifle in America.
* Close the gun-show loophole
Disagree.
* Criminal background checks
Disagree, already in place when buying from someone with an FFL.
* 3-day min. waiting period
Disagree.
* Strengthen training and licensing reqs
Disagree.
* Crack down hard on gun-sellers who break the law -- esp. suppliers to smugglers. Life prison for knowingly arming, i.e., Mexican drug cartels, unregulated militias, ex-cons.
Disagree, simply because it's not against the law to sell firearms to someone who belongs to an unregulated militia.
* Strengthen sentencing guidelines so that crimes of gun violence are punished more severely than violent crimes that do not involve the misuse of the 2nd Amendment.
Partial disagreement. I couldn't care less what weapon someone uses when committing a crime of violence, but I am in favor of strengthening sentencing guidelines for all violent crime.
I KNOW who these gun nuts really are. These are not good people, and they should not be armed.
What steps would you take to disarm them, and what would be the legal definition of a "gun nut"?
As for my recommendations, I would institute unrestricted concealed carry at the national level and repeal the 1986 ban on the new manufacture of fully automatic weapons for civilians. Given this trend:

I daresay my agenda has a better chance of coming to fruition than yours.
Obviously we're not going to come to a meeting of minds here; our agendas are diametrically opposed. That having been said, let me reiterate my appreciation of you being open and candid in expressing your agenda; I hope I've done the same.
Not about to happen with a Republican majority in the House and more than 40 Republicans in the Senate.
* Repeal Stand Your Ground laws (obvious one)
Disagree.
* Repeal Concealed Carry laws (no individual right to carry)
Disagree.
* Ban assault weapons, including for hunting (no right to bear an F-16 or nuke... reasonable limits on what can be sold)
Disagree with banning the most popular centerfire rifle in America.
* Close the gun-show loophole
Disagree.
* Criminal background checks
Disagree, already in place when buying from someone with an FFL.
* 3-day min. waiting period
Disagree.
* Strengthen training and licensing reqs
Disagree.
* Crack down hard on gun-sellers who break the law -- esp. suppliers to smugglers. Life prison for knowingly arming, i.e., Mexican drug cartels, unregulated militias, ex-cons.
Disagree, simply because it's not against the law to sell firearms to someone who belongs to an unregulated militia.
* Strengthen sentencing guidelines so that crimes of gun violence are punished more severely than violent crimes that do not involve the misuse of the 2nd Amendment.
Partial disagreement. I couldn't care less what weapon someone uses when committing a crime of violence, but I am in favor of strengthening sentencing guidelines for all violent crime.
I KNOW who these gun nuts really are. These are not good people, and they should not be armed.
What steps would you take to disarm them, and what would be the legal definition of a "gun nut"?
As for my recommendations, I would institute unrestricted concealed carry at the national level and repeal the 1986 ban on the new manufacture of fully automatic weapons for civilians. Given this trend:

I daresay my agenda has a better chance of coming to fruition than yours.
Obviously we're not going to come to a meeting of minds here; our agendas are diametrically opposed. That having been said, let me reiterate my appreciation of you being open and candid in expressing your agenda; I hope I've done the same.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't know. This Trayvon thing seems to be CONSUMING America [View all]
Canuckistanian
Apr 2012
OP
I think you know the answer to your question! Killing anyone in cold blood and using a f**k** up
teddy51
Apr 2012
#2
I just don't understand how anyone couldn't be outraged at what happened to Trayvon.
Obamacare
Apr 2012
#6
That first point, "nationalism". That was something the folk schools in Denmark
jtuck004
Apr 2012
#21
Once arrested there are 175 days to charge Zimmerman. That means 175 days to find evidence beyond
dkf
Apr 2012
#35
Nope because Florida has this specific 175 day law which doesn't seem to be the norm.
dkf
Apr 2012
#44
Not enough evidence? ROFL. Now THAT is the absurdity of which the OP was speaking. n/t
K Gardner
Apr 2012
#76
Here let me help you out. You don't even have to turn on the TV box. DU has it all! As always.
lonestarnot
Apr 2012
#66
I don't understand the whole "tears on his face" thing. Trayvon's own father
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2012
#41
Here's another one: Americans set up torture camps and nothing is done about it
just1voice
Apr 2012
#85